12-18-2018, 11:12 PM
Barkley is pretty hard to argue with. CMac would be the top back in the AFC. NFC is loaded at the position. One of the three (Gurley, Elliott and Barkley) will bow out. CMac should be the first alternate in.
As for Brady. He is about done.
As for Brady. He is about done.
(12-18-2018, 09:43 PM)winflop Wrote:(12-18-2018, 09:27 PM)BostonCard Wrote: http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/25568...all-league
Congrats to Zach Ertz and David DeCastro. Did I miss any others?
Stanford apparently led the league in "notable snubs"
Quote:Among the most notable snubs are NFC running backs Alvin Kamara and Christian McCaffrey -- but their position group is loaded, with Todd Gurley II, Ezekiel Elliott and Barkley making the field.
...
Another notable snub was Indianapolis Colts quarterback Andrew Luck, who is second in the NFL with 34 touchdown passes. (Mahomes leads the league with 45 TDs.)
BC
Brady over Luck is a Lifetime Achievement Award. Never know when it's gonna be his last. But comparing stats this is a no-brainer
Barkley over McCaffrey is more East Coast Bias. 6.05 ypp vs. 5.91 - not even close. McCaffrey is also a much more versatile threat and would be far more exciting to showcase in a Pro Bowl.