07-19-2019, 11:22 AM
The NYT article is short on facts and long on pointing and hand-waving. Only Stanford (or the coaches involved) can really shed light on the situation, and everyone seems to have a reason to keep mum (non-disparagement? reputation?). I would not assume Turley's situation is at all related. In fact, despite the article headline, I don't see Vandemoer's and Amerkhanian's situations as related at all either despite the ties of being in the same boathouse.
