[winflop]

Yeah, I agree that was an odd quote.  If any team deserves the benefit of the doubt for outperforming when the doubters proclaimed "this season is when Stanford will finally revert" year after year after year, it is Shaw's Stanford teams.  Like, compared to most on this board, I am pretty bearish on the team next year, but the fact that Shaw's teams have come through in the face of doubt in the past, is one of the strongest arguments against my bearishness.


BC

I'd consider 6-6 or worse a reversion. Anything better than that is at or above my expectations of 7-5

---

And one that will warm winflop's heart:

Jerry Palm: The Pac-12 will be looking for a new commissioner to replace Larry Scott before the year is out.  

BC

My heart is never warmed by someone losing their job. But Scott has abjectly failed to deliver and the conference needs a stronger commissioner who will forcefully stand up for it on the national stage, and it needs to relocate to a lower-cost city

[winflop]

Yeah, I agree that was an odd quote.  If any team deserves the benefit of the doubt for outperforming when the doubters proclaimed "this season is when Stanford will finally revert" year after year after year, it is Shaw's Stanford teams.  Like, compared to most on this board, I am pretty bearish on the team next year, but the fact that Shaw's teams have come through in the face of doubt in the past, is one of the strongest arguments against my bearishness.


BC

I'd consider 6-6 or worse a reversion. Anything better than that is at or above my expectations of 7-5

---

And one that will warm winflop's heart:

Jerry Palm: The Pac-12 will be looking for a new commissioner to replace Larry Scott before the year is out.  

BC

My heart is never warmed by someone losing their job. But Scott has abjectly failed to deliver and the conference needs a stronger commissioner who will forcefully stand up for it on the national stage, and it needs to relocate to a lower-cost city