03-28-2020, 03:05 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-28-2020, 03:08 PM by UltimateCard.)
(03-28-2020, 01:39 PM)Goose Wrote:Quote:<snip>With respect, that is exactly what we do NOT need. The body politic is absolutely unable to make such a decision even at the best of times with no time pressure. Worse still, we have proven once again that our population is unable to understand the idea of constraints. Look at the people going to the beach in crowds when they should all know social distancing should preclude this. Most people will decide everybody should have a ventilator, even though that is impossible. Further, the people who have to actually make the decision at the moments of truth can't be bound by a policy that was established by majority votes cast by people who aren't responsible for actually deciding who lives and who dies. Let the doctors and hospitals make their policies. They are the ones who actually know what is going on when and if the decisions have to be made. They have ethics boards and have already considered these difficult problems as part of their professional training. They are also the only ones that can make a reasonable guess at the actual results of their decisions given the conditions on the ground at that time. In point of fact, those are the people who will decide, whatever the population might say.
We also need to start having a national discussion about who should be given scarce ventilator service and who should be given hospice care because they are likely to die without a ventilator.
National discussion pre-empted, per HHS bulletin released today (from NYTimes update): Federal civil rights office rejects rationing medical care based on disability or age https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/...-28-20.pdf
