[slide]

Here is Borders on preseason 1st team all 6A: https://recruitgeorgia.com/class-6-a-pre...l-state-3/

Can you link me to the top 100 list?

this is the 6A link:  https://www.ajc.com/sports/high-school-s...VTUYO2GLM/

on the Georgia Power 100, I've not seen a link to it yet.  I received material via the Georgia High School Football Daily email service.

it will be interesting to see how Borders does in Carrollton.  iirc there are 6 D-1 recruits on the team's defense.

---

...so much as Shaw wants all his offers to be committable (for better or for worse), meaning we don't offer someone else until it's confirmed that the initial targets are off the board. This happens way too late for many of the next tier of recruits who has already built up relationships with many other coaching staffs for months on end.

Sam -- good points but I wanted to highlight the one above in your post.  may as well dispel with this myth too.  the 3 QBs offered in '22 is just another proof point that this "offerable/committable" position is just not supported by data.  Shaw/staff may manage by yield number but all too often we have a lot of early offers that exceed the number of slots we will have open.  

I like the more aggressive offer strategy for '22.  it appears that the personal HC and coach engagement has picked up too.  I am hopeful that Shaw will revert back to stance #1 on spring OVs (he supported them initially) and discard subsequent stances #2 and #3 and use many of them (up to 20) on whale offerees.  we can save a set number of OVs for bonding weekend.

[slide]

Here is Borders on preseason 1st team all 6A: https://recruitgeorgia.com/class-6-a-pre...l-state-3/

Can you link me to the top 100 list?

this is the 6A link:  https://www.ajc.com/sports/high-school-s...VTUYO2GLM/

on the Georgia Power 100, I've not seen a link to it yet.  I received material via the Georgia High School Football Daily email service.

it will be interesting to see how Borders does in Carrollton.  iirc there are 6 D-1 recruits on the team's defense.

---

...so much as Shaw wants all his offers to be committable (for better or for worse), meaning we don't offer someone else until it's confirmed that the initial targets are off the board. This happens way too late for many of the next tier of recruits who has already built up relationships with many other coaching staffs for months on end.

Sam -- good points but I wanted to highlight the one above in your post.  may as well dispel with this myth too.  the 3 QBs offered in '22 is just another proof point that this "offerable/committable" position is just not supported by data.  Shaw/staff may manage by yield number but all too often we have a lot of early offers that exceed the number of slots we will have open.  

I like the more aggressive offer strategy for '22.  it appears that the personal HC and coach engagement has picked up too.  I am hopeful that Shaw will revert back to stance #1 on spring OVs (he supported them initially) and discard subsequent stances #2 and #3 and use many of them (up to 20) on whale offerees.  we can save a set number of OVs for bonding weekend.