[DocSavage87]

I can't believe people listen to the stuff he says.

Agreed. So sad. Disastrous current events these days, stuff I would have never thought possible.

I can't believe that Biden/Harris was the best that the Dems could do...

Yeah, when faced with a president who is actively undermining our ability to prevent spread of the virus, it's important to focus on deficiencies of the challenger.

Well, if the goal is to remove the incumbent who is actively undermining ability to prevent spread of the virus, you think you might want to vet the deficiencies of the challenger.  I mean, the goal is to win in November, right?  BTW, I agree with BC re: match-ups and long thought the Dems should run a white male against Trump.  Still, Old Joe is a bit risky on the marbles front . . . but with the assistance of an agenda-driven MSM, Joe should come out on top.  

Given my personal outlook, I'm good with the end play.  But I can still lament the condition of the Fourth Estate (I blame the Internet!).

My point about the @Mick reply is that he's really not interested in the how to best remove Trump, it's a common whataboutism-style rebuttal to people complaining about the actions of our sitting president.  You can argue how I'm misinterpreting things, etc... whatever.  We're talking about COVID-19 response here.  The topic is about misinformation, which is clearly being disseminated by our supposed commander-in-chief.  I've seen plenty of responses from those in MAGA that deflect that discussion in favor of whatever else they can.  Tired of it.

[DocSavage87]

I can't believe people listen to the stuff he says.

Agreed. So sad. Disastrous current events these days, stuff I would have never thought possible.

I can't believe that Biden/Harris was the best that the Dems could do...

Yeah, when faced with a president who is actively undermining our ability to prevent spread of the virus, it's important to focus on deficiencies of the challenger.

Well, if the goal is to remove the incumbent who is actively undermining ability to prevent spread of the virus, you think you might want to vet the deficiencies of the challenger.  I mean, the goal is to win in November, right?  BTW, I agree with BC re: match-ups and long thought the Dems should run a white male against Trump.  Still, Old Joe is a bit risky on the marbles front . . . but with the assistance of an agenda-driven MSM, Joe should come out on top.  

Given my personal outlook, I'm good with the end play.  But I can still lament the condition of the Fourth Estate (I blame the Internet!).

My point about the @Mick reply is that he's really not interested in the how to best remove Trump, it's a common whataboutism-style rebuttal to people complaining about the actions of our sitting president.  You can argue how I'm misinterpreting things, etc... whatever.  We're talking about COVID-19 response here.  The topic is about misinformation, which is clearly being disseminated by our supposed commander-in-chief.  I've seen plenty of responses from those in MAGA that deflect that discussion in favor of whatever else they can.  Tired of it.