[Langdude]

I think we our most common offensive personnel package is 11.


BC

LOL. I thought it was funny that they listed 12 starters, too. That's why I wonder if they listed three WR starters to make Simi Fehoko feel better.



-m.

In case it wasn't apparent, I meant the personnel package (1 RB, 1 TE, and thus 3 WR), not the number of players on offense.  Really, we use the fullback on a fraction of our plays, and thus it is probably more appropriate to name a third wide receiver as a starter than to name our FB.

BC

Yeah; I know. We actually have more often used two TE over one FB, too. I was just pointing out the fact that in the sheet, it lists 12 starters on offense. We've never listed like that before.

We haven't done a lot with FB since maybe ... Ryan Hewitt? Daniel Marx?

-m.

[Langdude]

I think we our most common offensive personnel package is 11.


BC

LOL. I thought it was funny that they listed 12 starters, too. That's why I wonder if they listed three WR starters to make Simi Fehoko feel better.



-m.

In case it wasn't apparent, I meant the personnel package (1 RB, 1 TE, and thus 3 WR), not the number of players on offense.  Really, we use the fullback on a fraction of our plays, and thus it is probably more appropriate to name a third wide receiver as a starter than to name our FB.

BC

Yeah; I know. We actually have more often used two TE over one FB, too. I was just pointing out the fact that in the sheet, it lists 12 starters on offense. We've never listed like that before.

We haven't done a lot with FB since maybe ... Ryan Hewitt? Daniel Marx?

-m.