(11-14-2020, 05:08 PM)JohnR34231 Wrote:(11-14-2020, 05:04 PM)winflop Wrote:(11-14-2020, 04:59 PM)Langdude Wrote:(11-14-2020, 04:56 PM)winflop Wrote: How is this drive not being run as a 2-minute offense? Inconceivably bad coaching...scoring with 2:30 left instead of 3:30 or 4 makes a world of difference
Gilmore was saying how there was a lack of urgency. Seems that has been a pattern the last few years on two-minute drills.
-m.
Sure would be different if Colorado were punting from its 30 with 1:30 left vs midfield with 0:19.
And I bet nobody in the media will question Shaw about this post-game or on Tuesday...gutless wimps
Well. at least we came back and made a game of it.
Not even a pyrrhic victory. I was less frustrated last week because I'm not sure that even with Mills & Weddington we could have won. This week I'm more frustrated because coaching was the difference - AGAIN.
(11-14-2020, 05:28 PM)OutsiderFan Wrote: IF second half Mills would have been playing against Oregon and Colorado for a full game, you could make an argument Stanford could be 2-0.
BUT, there is far, far, far too much terrible execution, questionable strategy, game mismanagement, and lack of urgency across 8 quarters of football for me to really buy into this being a legit position to take,
If the weather's nice next Saturday I'll be on the golf course. It'll be the first time in years that I will voluntarily skip watching a Stanford game that I could see. Even if it's free, it's no longer worth my time.
Stanford football 2020 = Stanford MBB circa 2013
