12-21-2020, 03:26 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-21-2020, 03:31 PM by BostonCard.)
(12-21-2020, 03:09 PM)81alum Wrote: 2) We did out rebound UCLA, but as far as O boards not so much--they had 15 to our 14. Those 15 O boards and UCLA's advantage in turnovers (7 to 16) allowed them to take a whopping 11 more shots than we did--69 to 58. That did go a long way toward neutralizing our 40% to 29% shooting advantage. So Tara needs her team to work on boxing out and making less risky passes. Do that and this would have been a blowout game.
On the UCLA side, there were 52 contestable rebounds, of which UCLA got 15 (28.8% of contestable rebounds).
On our side, there were only 36 contestable rebounds, of which we got 14 (38.9% of contestable rebounds).
I wouldn't worry too much about UCLA having numerically more offensive rebounds; they had a lot more chances to get an offensive rebound. I don't have the women's basketball numbers, but over the course of a whole season, 29% offensive rebounding percentage would have ranked 80th out of 320 MBB teams, so we could stand to improve our defensive rebounding. An offensive rebounding percentage of 39% is outstanding, and would have been in the top-5 among MBB teams last year.
BC
Fran's dunk (#2 of the year!)
[tweet]https://twitter.com/BleacherReport/status/1341140231798571009?s=20[/tweet]
BC
