[teejers1]

Bienemy has a significant criminal rap sheet.

So you are saying he'll fit right in.

BC

Perhaps, but I think the "new" administration at U$C is being a bit careful about appearances. I am not sure that extends to substance, but right now with their recent problems having a squeaky clean coach is important. Whether or not the past history of 20 years ago is long enought to provide that is unknown to me.

I'm all for second chances and 20 years seems a long time ago (assuming sheet crimes aren't too egregious).  

But I find it both amusing and sad that a criminal act years ago (rightfully - assuming debt to society repaid) doesn't DQ you from a job; whereas an imprudent post on social media or some other "incorrect" thought or action (albeit non-criminal) DQs you from all kinds of stuff.  That strikes me as so WHACK!

[teejers1]

Bienemy has a significant criminal rap sheet.

So you are saying he'll fit right in.

BC

Perhaps, but I think the "new" administration at U$C is being a bit careful about appearances. I am not sure that extends to substance, but right now with their recent problems having a squeaky clean coach is important. Whether or not the past history of 20 years ago is long enought to provide that is unknown to me.

I'm all for second chances and 20 years seems a long time ago (assuming sheet crimes aren't too egregious).  

But I find it both amusing and sad that a criminal act years ago (rightfully - assuming debt to society repaid) doesn't DQ you from a job; whereas an imprudent post on social media or some other "incorrect" thought or action (albeit non-criminal) DQs you from all kinds of stuff.  That strikes me as so WHACK!