11-08-2021, 04:28 PM
(11-08-2021, 03:26 PM)Goose Wrote:(11-08-2021, 02:20 PM)Red80 Wrote: Speaking of Oregon and Aliotti, two of the greatest wins in Stanford football history were against Oregon in '12 and '13. UO was ranked #1 when SU beat them in Eugene, 17-14. One year later, #3 Oregon, averaging 55 points and 600 yards per game, was bludgeoned to death on national TV by a Stanford offense that held the ball for an astonishing 43 minutes. One of my all-time favorite Stanford football memories was watching virtually all of the many Oregon fans exiting the stadium by the end of the 3rd quarter.IMHO David Shaw would bring back that offense if he could. He can't, because the players don't exist anymore, or to the extent they do they are not going to attend Stanford. High School football has gone toward the spread option and the passing game. The rules have done the same. There aren't a lot of big power backs out there. Offensive coordinators don't want to run that system because there is no glory in it, no big name and no NFL/Head Coach job. Players don't want to play in that system because it is viewed as a dead end. What happened 10 years ago is not available to Stanford any more. I think Shaw actively prefers that style (obviously I haven't been able to ask him myself). He has been forced to change over the last 6 or so years not necessarily because he wanted to but because he had to.
I’m going to hazard a guess that Stanford put out more NFL offensive players from 2010-2015 than any other 6 year period. From 08 to 15 they had the Hiseman runner up 4 times. Several coaches moved on HC jobs in College. A few others took coordinator jobs in the NFL.
You certainly can find physically gifted offensive and defensive lineman. And running backs/QBs to play behind that line. There are several Big 10 teams that employ this style effectively.
One question I have is the impact on the emphasis on less contact during practice
