[gailtate]

You don’t actually have to read all the posts from the nattering nabobs of negativism of they upset you.  Everyone has a right to post, good, bad, or ugly; but not everyone has to be read if you find their posts tendentious.  And that goes the other way too; for the people who find the Shawpologists too polyanna, you don’t have to read us.

BC

I really miss the old, free-for-all Bootleg. No rogue rebels to be found here as long as the self-styled, wannabe Stasi monitors the halls. What a joke.


Evidently, that's not the case. Some people don't have the "right" to post, good, bad or ugly. As I'm now apparently unbanned and can post, I'm still curious why I was banned in the first place and was provided no explanation. I even reached out privately to an admin for an explanation, and disappointingly, he didn't give me the courtesy of a reply. What a bummer from a Stanford guy. . . .

[gailtate]

You don’t actually have to read all the posts from the nattering nabobs of negativism of they upset you.  Everyone has a right to post, good, bad, or ugly; but not everyone has to be read if you find their posts tendentious.  And that goes the other way too; for the people who find the Shawpologists too polyanna, you don’t have to read us.

BC

I really miss the old, free-for-all Bootleg. No rogue rebels to be found here as long as the self-styled, wannabe Stasi monitors the halls. What a joke.


Evidently, that's not the case. Some people don't have the "right" to post, good, bad or ugly. As I'm now apparently unbanned and can post, I'm still curious why I was banned in the first place and was provided no explanation. I even reached out privately to an admin for an explanation, and disappointingly, he didn't give me the courtesy of a reply. What a bummer from a Stanford guy. . . .