[MV72018]

1. On O, Stanford played as poorly in the second half (19 points) as it played excellently in the first (42 points). We were outscored by 18 points in H2.    

2. Second H2 collapse in a row. Apparently the coaches couldn't come up with any adjustments or other way to brake SC's long rally from 18 down, even after seeing what happened in the 3rd quarter at Tennessee. SC's combination of discipline, poise, energy, and desire earned the win.      

3. CB (1 for 7 from the field) needs to improve against serious competition and to be more consistent if the Cardinal is to reach the Final Four next spring. Not playing close to her potential.   

4. The point-guard problem came back to haunt us again. AW: 6 TOs. The game probably turned on TOs; SU had 20 while SC had only 7. I'd like to see how many points SC got off those Stanford TOs.

[MV72018]

1. On O, Stanford played as poorly in the second half (19 points) as it played excellently in the first (42 points). We were outscored by 18 points in H2.    

2. Second H2 collapse in a row. Apparently the coaches couldn't come up with any adjustments or other way to brake SC's long rally from 18 down, even after seeing what happened in the 3rd quarter at Tennessee. SC's combination of discipline, poise, energy, and desire earned the win.      

3. CB (1 for 7 from the field) needs to improve against serious competition and to be more consistent if the Cardinal is to reach the Final Four next spring. Not playing close to her potential.   

4. The point-guard problem came back to haunt us again. AW: 6 TOs. The game probably turned on TOs; SU had 20 while SC had only 7. I'd like to see how many points SC got off those Stanford TOs.