06-12-2022, 07:02 AM
(06-09-2022, 09:26 PM)lex24 Wrote:(06-09-2022, 09:14 PM)BostonCard Wrote:(06-09-2022, 05:42 AM)OutsiderFan Wrote: the W's decided to go soft once again after they got the lead.
Did they take a vote?
BC
No, but it’s obvious Kerr needs help. Baffling….
Why was it obvious Kerr needs help?
And if you are taking exception to me saying only playing Looney for 17 minutes in Game 3 was baffling (which is questioning a decision, not suggesting the one making it isn't fit to make it), I'm curious what you would say to the fact that after Game 4 Kerr said he made a mistake not playing Looney more in Game 3? What else is someone suppose to think when they really don't understand a decision?
Anyway... In some ways, the end of Game 4 was similar to the end of Game 1. In both cases, the visiting team started making shots, the home team got tight, and the visiting team pulled away as the desperation of the home team led to more misses. It lasted longer and the point spread was larger in Game 1, but the end results meant the same thing; the home team lost.
The Warriors didn't win by shooting an insane percentage in the 4th as much as they - and Klay Thompson in particular, which was awesome to see - ratcheted up the defensive intensity.
Through Game 4 points scored:
Warriors: 422
Celtics: 421
My W's in 6 prediction is still alive, but it seems kind of destined to go to Game 7, does it not?