[cardcrimson]

And back to Mick's point about being robbed the touchdown.  Do we know the rule for establishing a catch in bounds?  If the receiver has control of the ball, touches a toe in bounds, then touches the heel of the same foot out of bounds, is that a catch?  Or do the folks who are outraged think that the entire foot, or at least the portion that touched turf, was in bounds the whole time of contact?

I'm certain his toe touched in bounds before the rest of the foot.  It was less clear whether any of the rest of the foot ever touched out of bounds.

As mentioned above, but perhaps missed. A similar situation happened in the game on ABC just prior to our game. Receiver got a toe in, but the heel eventually touched out. Ruled a completion live, overturned on replay. Out of bounds. As explained by the TV ref, if the heel touches in a continuous motion, it is out of bounds. Both heels hit in a continuous motion. . . .

[cardcrimson]

And back to Mick's point about being robbed the touchdown.  Do we know the rule for establishing a catch in bounds?  If the receiver has control of the ball, touches a toe in bounds, then touches the heel of the same foot out of bounds, is that a catch?  Or do the folks who are outraged think that the entire foot, or at least the portion that touched turf, was in bounds the whole time of contact?

I'm certain his toe touched in bounds before the rest of the foot.  It was less clear whether any of the rest of the foot ever touched out of bounds.

As mentioned above, but perhaps missed. A similar situation happened in the game on ABC just prior to our game. Receiver got a toe in, but the heel eventually touched out. Ruled a completion live, overturned on replay. Out of bounds. As explained by the TV ref, if the heel touches in a continuous motion, it is out of bounds. Both heels hit in a continuous motion. . . .