(09-22-2022, 10:03 AM)msqueri Wrote:(09-22-2022, 09:47 AM)winflop Wrote:(09-22-2022, 08:37 AM)JohnR34231 Wrote: Yeah, I think many Cardboarders have answered the question of how much longer do things have to suck before we conclude changes have to be made. Their answer is we should have already concluded it.
If by "changes have to be made" you mean changes to the coaching staff then I think you're right. If you mean that Shaw needs to go I'm not sure too many of us are there. I'm not. As I've said previously, I think Shaw's overall record has earned him the right to fix the mess he's made. But if he's unwilling to fix it, and results don't improve then he needs to go.
How can you say IF he's unwilling to fix it when Lance Anderson is still the defensive coordinator?
How long does that right to fix the mess he's made apply?
This season. If it's not materially better (i.e., six wins or more) then either the majority of the coaching staff needs to be shown the door or Shaw does
(09-22-2022, 01:53 PM)murky Wrote: Which of Stanford's last 5 or 6 head coaches would you rather have instead of Shaw? Based on when they left Stanford.
I'd rather have Green, Harbaugh, or Willingham than the Shaw we have now. IN A HEARTBEAT. I might even prefer Walsh 2.0