12-24-2022, 11:56 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-24-2022, 12:05 PM by OutsiderFan.)
(12-24-2022, 11:37 AM)Phogge Wrote: What papers do you read in “Carolina.”
What blogs do you follow in “Carolina?”
How many people in “Carolina” have told you directly that he “can’t be trusted?”
As for Third and King, are you privy to dope on Correa’s physical?
I doubt all in your posts. No sources, no banana.
Carolina papers and blogs have nothing at all to do with the sentiment that kept Christian McCaffrey from being voted a Pro Bowl player.
I thought the Giants looked foolish based on the fact they called a presser before doing the physical, and questioned their lack of due diligence in general. Where you get any other ideas is between your ears.
(12-24-2022, 11:39 AM)French Rage Wrote: They're clearly looking at pure rushing yards, where Sanders and Pollard are ahead of him, so let's not make this into something larger. An RB who can play WR and an WR who can play RB may be what every team looks for and needs now, but there's no spot for it currently in Pro Bowl voting. Probably should be.
More fuel to your fire... Deebo Samuel only made the Pro Bowl last year because the first half of the year he had big receiving yard numbers. If he had performed in the first half are a receiver as he did the second last year, he never would have made the Pro Bowl as a WR. The fact he did so much as a RB in the second half added to his fame, but didn't factor into his Pro Bowl selection for the reasons you stated. WRs make it based on receiving yards. RBs make it based on rushing yards. That said, I still think McCaffrey's recent injury history and Carolina sucking early were big factors in his Pro Bowl snub. If he played on the Niners and produced as he has since joining Niners, he'd have been voted to Pro Bowl, IMO. He is just too much of an offensive weapon to not be considered a Pro Bowl player, regardless of not having league leading rushing stats.