03-02-2023, 01:13 PM
(03-02-2023, 11:23 AM)SamuelMcF Wrote:(03-02-2023, 10:35 AM)SkiBum80 Wrote: Thanks, great info.
Any idea or comparison how the extent of these offers might compare to recent prior years at about this time?
Offers by date: 3/2/2023
2018: 25 (pathetic)
2019: 51
2020: 47
2021: 33
2022: 65
2023: 67
2024: 72
The first half-ish of this cycle's offers were under the previous staff, so unknown just how many of those guys are still "in play" or even on the new staff's board. We'll almost certainly see more offers this cycle than any others because of that.
I'll stop including 2018 after this cycle but keep it there to remind everyone how godawful the recruiting process was that cycle. That single class had a negative effect on the team for years, all the way up until this previous season when we should've had a bunch of 5th-year seniors but only had Bonner and Symonds (and Patrick Fields, who wasn't in the class initially).
Again great info.
Even us non-math majors can understand 72 is better than 25.
Seems at least an indication that T.T.&CO. have hit the ground running and been productive so far.
Of course an offer not equal a signing.
But how many signings made without making an offer?
So I'd much prefer my chances with the 72 than the 25.
