03-04-2023, 10:30 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-04-2023, 10:48 PM by BostonCard.)
(03-04-2023, 05:32 PM)81alum Wrote: Jump is a Psych major. Stanford only gives masters in Psychology to PhD candidates who collect them along the way--there is no stand-alone masters program. She would have to find some other MA different from what she has majored in as an undergrad, and that could be a challenge.
As a Stanford undergraduate, she can apply for a coterminal MA in psychology. See:
https://web.stanford.edu/dept/registrar/...2/6609.htm
Quote: Coterminal Program—Stanford undergraduates who would like advanced training in Psychology may apply for a coterminal M.A. degree in Psychology. To do so, students should consult with the student services office. Along with a coterminal program application, applicants must submit:
* a statement of purpose
* a preliminary program plan specifying the courses in which they intend to enroll to fulfill degree requirements
* at least two letters of recommendation from Stanford faculty members familiar with their academic work
* a current Stanford undergraduate transcript
* a written nomination by a member of the Psychology faculty willing to serve as the student's master's degree adviser
This program is limited in size and admission is selective. Applicants must have earned a minimum of 120 units towards graduation as shown on the undergraduate transcript. The department's deadline for the submission of an application to the coterminal program is traditionally in January.
(03-04-2023, 05:29 PM)2006alum Wrote:(03-04-2023, 05:04 PM)cardfan1996 Wrote: All this talk about being humble and gracious. Some of you old folks need to get a grip. This is a fan board. Of course I stand by my position and will defend my position re: Oregon post. Stanford scored more than 60 pts but the offense was still anemic. I didn’t think I would have to further defend that post after the UCLA game to be honest.Indeed, one hosted and run by others, with its own norms and practices. If a number of longtime posters around here are asking that you cool the tone a bit, nothing wrong with fitting in.
Edited: I previously mentioned my stance on player minutes after Haley played 50 minutes in the Colorado game where I called it unethical (that was before my Oregon post). I mention it all the time because it’s a topic I have thought a lot about for years.
And from our usernames, I'm younger than you (and most folks around here), but squarely in the 81 etc. camp that incisive analysis need not include divisive language.
I would add that as fan boards go, this one tends to be better than most. There are many longtime posters here who don’t suffer fools, and the “it’s a fan board” excuse for asshattery doesn’t wear well. Just because one can display a certain attitude with posts without running afoul of the rules doesn’t mean that one should.
BC
