[dabigv13]

Remember, from day one of this breaking, Stanford institutionally has tried to evade and deny, which mirrors MTL's alleged response to the initial incident at Genentech. Personally I trust the press over the Stanford investigation, whose inception seems to have been a whitewash though perhaps that will have shifted given the Daily's continued reporting.

Eventually MTL will be let go for this. Stanford should have suspended him months ago pending the outcome of formal investigation, and should still do so now. The longer the wait, the worse the hit to Stanford's reputation, and the longer we will have an ineffective president.

Goose, to answer a previous question of yours, the results were never replicated. MTL's lab a couple years later published other papers that showed a different mechanism of action.

[dabigv13]

Remember, from day one of this breaking, Stanford institutionally has tried to evade and deny, which mirrors MTL's alleged response to the initial incident at Genentech. Personally I trust the press over the Stanford investigation, whose inception seems to have been a whitewash though perhaps that will have shifted given the Daily's continued reporting.

Eventually MTL will be let go for this. Stanford should have suspended him months ago pending the outcome of formal investigation, and should still do so now. The longer the wait, the worse the hit to Stanford's reputation, and the longer we will have an ineffective president.

Goose, to answer a previous question of yours, the results were never replicated. MTL's lab a couple years later published other papers that showed a different mechanism of action.