[jonnyss]

goose, regarding going on the record, as i understand the daily, theo baker is trying to raise awareness that the stanford board is doing only a superficial investigation. i believe he is saying that the board has had the info - in some cases for several months - to interview some or all of baker's sources but has thus far neglected to reach out. 

seems reasonable to me that the next step in credibility is for the board to interview those sources rather than for the sources to speak publicly. 

also, some of the complaints now have to do with mtl's response, which is current, public, quite visible - and, apparently, to some faculty, in several ways not the dignified response of a university president.

[jonnyss]

goose, regarding going on the record, as i understand the daily, theo baker is trying to raise awareness that the stanford board is doing only a superficial investigation. i believe he is saying that the board has had the info - in some cases for several months - to interview some or all of baker's sources but has thus far neglected to reach out. 

seems reasonable to me that the next step in credibility is for the board to interview those sources rather than for the sources to speak publicly. 

also, some of the complaints now have to do with mtl's response, which is current, public, quite visible - and, apparently, to some faculty, in several ways not the dignified response of a university president.