[BosCard]

Lol 
You mean like every good guard did against Stanford all season and Betts didn’t play . 
No need to be bitter 
Be happy the “slow project “ is gone plus the other McDonald’s All American you had and live with what you have left . 


quote="BosCard" pid='388486' dateline='1681853785']

So they are going to change the way they play to accommodate her style so she can play big minutes even though they still have basically the same personnel including another year of Osborne, who needs the ball a lot, and three more of Rice, plus all those other posts?  Might happen, definitely might happen.

Betts will have to become a better perimeter defender if she is going to play major minutes.  Otherwise teams are going to switch guards on to her and drive right by.

---

So they are going to change the way they play to accommodate her style so she can play big minutes even though they still have basically the same personnel including another year of Osborne, who needs the ball a lot, and three more of Rice, plus all those other posts?  Might happen, definitely might happen.

Betts will have to become a better perimeter defender if she is going to play major minutes.  Otherwise teams are going to switch guards on to her and drive right by.

The stats are clear - Stanford was better with Betts in the line up

If you can’t see the difference between how Brink defended a perimeter player vs Betts then you are clearly a biased family member.

In the limited chances she was given I saw her get beat once or twice maybe but I did see multiple blocks against guards against Arizona and other teams without fouls which is something other players struggle with .
[/quote]

You do realize that Brink was named the national defensive player of the year.  If you think Betts was a better defender than Brink then I wish you and your daughter the best of luck in proving that next year.

[BosCard]

Lol 
You mean like every good guard did against Stanford all season and Betts didn’t play . 
No need to be bitter 
Be happy the “slow project “ is gone plus the other McDonald’s All American you had and live with what you have left . 


quote="BosCard" pid='388486' dateline='1681853785']

So they are going to change the way they play to accommodate her style so she can play big minutes even though they still have basically the same personnel including another year of Osborne, who needs the ball a lot, and three more of Rice, plus all those other posts?  Might happen, definitely might happen.

Betts will have to become a better perimeter defender if she is going to play major minutes.  Otherwise teams are going to switch guards on to her and drive right by.

---

So they are going to change the way they play to accommodate her style so she can play big minutes even though they still have basically the same personnel including another year of Osborne, who needs the ball a lot, and three more of Rice, plus all those other posts?  Might happen, definitely might happen.

Betts will have to become a better perimeter defender if she is going to play major minutes.  Otherwise teams are going to switch guards on to her and drive right by.

The stats are clear - Stanford was better with Betts in the line up

If you can’t see the difference between how Brink defended a perimeter player vs Betts then you are clearly a biased family member.

In the limited chances she was given I saw her get beat once or twice maybe but I did see multiple blocks against guards against Arizona and other teams without fouls which is something other players struggle with .
[/quote]

You do realize that Brink was named the national defensive player of the year.  If you think Betts was a better defender than Brink then I wish you and your daughter the best of luck in proving that next year.