08-10-2023, 07:50 AM
(08-09-2023, 10:31 PM)Mudhead Wrote:(08-09-2023, 08:49 PM)triangle2 Wrote: But some of us remember when the PAC-10 was a crap conference other than Stanford, except for brief periods of competency and tournament appearances by USC/UCLA/Washington. It’s not like Coach Tara doesn’t remember, or Kate Paye for that matter. We can go back to scheduling a tough preseason and then enduring the “why should Stanford get a high seed because the conference sucks” discussions. I’m not particularly worried about WBB. Some of the other non revenue sports I do worry about. As in: which sports are going to be dropped.
Good points and I hope you are right. women’s bb is my number one sport of interest at Stanford. In the “old days” there were not that many strong WBB schools i the US and there were not big NIL opportunities. It if I had to bet, I’d bet on much tougher recruiting and roster attrition via the portal . I just don’t think we can be a UCONN ..
Totally agree. The environment isn't the same as in the 90's or 2000's. I think if we don't end up in a power 5 conference that it is going to hit the roster hard for all sports and future recruiting even harder. Playing against the best regularly became a draw for players coming to the PAC.
