[Giants]

1694086677[/url]']

1694063612[/url]']

1694059095[/url]']
On July 18, the Giants were 13 games over .500, 54-41. They had just won seven straight. They then proceeded to lose six straight, and have gone 16-28 since then. Utterly and completely grim.

I heard it was all because they sent Matos down last week for a couple of games. . . .

Your ability to refute assertions that were never made, but are close, is truly remarkable.

I explicitly said I doubt having Matos would have made a difference, just said I didn’t like sending him down when they did. But it’s not fun to point that out because it doesn’t fit the preferred version that allows you to assert I erroneously asserted Matos would have saved them.

It’s interesting, I exactly predicted the Giants August record, but I see no post from you pointing that out.

Whoa - you were wrong about August.  You said 11-16, they were 12-15. Don’t forget August has 31 days.

[Giants]

1694086677[/url]']

1694063612[/url]']

1694059095[/url]']
On July 18, the Giants were 13 games over .500, 54-41. They had just won seven straight. They then proceeded to lose six straight, and have gone 16-28 since then. Utterly and completely grim.

I heard it was all because they sent Matos down last week for a couple of games. . . .

Your ability to refute assertions that were never made, but are close, is truly remarkable.

I explicitly said I doubt having Matos would have made a difference, just said I didn’t like sending him down when they did. But it’s not fun to point that out because it doesn’t fit the preferred version that allows you to assert I erroneously asserted Matos would have saved them.

It’s interesting, I exactly predicted the Giants August record, but I see no post from you pointing that out.

Whoa - you were wrong about August.  You said 11-16, they were 12-15. Don’t forget August has 31 days.