09-13-2023, 12:07 PM
https://evollve.net/
This is a website that ranks 344 Division I teams using proprietary algorithms.
Ranking for chances of scoring a point against an average team taking into account strength of schedule:
Stanford when receiving serve: ranked #1
Stanford when serving; ranked #10
If I understand their terminology correctly it leads me to believe Stanford serving is not as effective as perhaps it could be. I noticed in recent games Baird and Kipp have been mixing hard serves with lollipop serves. For the most part I thought Stanford's hardest serves did not stress Nebraska's serve receive. It seemed like serve location was more of a factor than velocity of serve.
FWIW their current overall rankings have Nebraska #1 and Stanford #2.
Do you want to reveal who you think the one recruit is? I assume this is 2025 since 2024 is pretty well established.
This is a website that ranks 344 Division I teams using proprietary algorithms.
Ranking for chances of scoring a point against an average team taking into account strength of schedule:
Stanford when receiving serve: ranked #1
Stanford when serving; ranked #10
If I understand their terminology correctly it leads me to believe Stanford serving is not as effective as perhaps it could be. I noticed in recent games Baird and Kipp have been mixing hard serves with lollipop serves. For the most part I thought Stanford's hardest serves did not stress Nebraska's serve receive. It seemed like serve location was more of a factor than velocity of serve.
FWIW their current overall rankings have Nebraska #1 and Stanford #2.
(09-09-2023, 08:42 AM)BobK Wrote: Two recruits at the game. Any research on who. I have a strong guess on one but no clue on the other
Do you want to reveal who you think the one recruit is? I assume this is 2025 since 2024 is pretty well established.