[MV72018]

-7 or -7.5 depending on the book.

  

That's all? -- I think we cover THAT spread.  And the Cardboard average is runnign +10 for CARD

ESPN analytics currently gives us an 85.6% likelihood of winning with Stanford -6.5 and an O/U of 60.5 implying around 34-27

Is our Defense that bad... 27 points to an FCS team (a good one), where our coach knows their players capabilities?

Yep

Hey, George. 

I'm curious how you concluded that La Jetee won the prediction contest ovr me.

La Jetee picked SacState 37-23. So he was 7 points off on Sac State's total point score and correct about Stanford's.

I predicted Sac State 28-SU 24. So I was 2 points off Sac State's total score and 1 point off of Stanfords.

So I don't understand how La Jetee won when s/he was a total of 7 points off and I was only a total of 3 points off.

Could you kindly explain that?

Thanks,

MV72018

[MV72018]

-7 or -7.5 depending on the book.

  

That's all? -- I think we cover THAT spread.  And the Cardboard average is runnign +10 for CARD

ESPN analytics currently gives us an 85.6% likelihood of winning with Stanford -6.5 and an O/U of 60.5 implying around 34-27

Is our Defense that bad... 27 points to an FCS team (a good one), where our coach knows their players capabilities?

Yep

Hey, George. 

I'm curious how you concluded that La Jetee won the prediction contest ovr me.

La Jetee picked SacState 37-23. So he was 7 points off on Sac State's total point score and correct about Stanford's.

I predicted Sac State 28-SU 24. So I was 2 points off Sac State's total score and 1 point off of Stanfords.

So I don't understand how La Jetee won when s/he was a total of 7 points off and I was only a total of 3 points off.

Could you kindly explain that?

Thanks,

MV72018