[cardcrimson]

Tom Verducci had a terrific article on the Giants being the most boring of the contenders.  He focused on the lack of stars, lack of athleticism and speed, the dependence on openers and bullpen games (Giants starters average the fewest number of pitches of any team.  It’s not close.). Constant lineup shuffling. Mix and match etc.  

He is spot on. I watch upwards of 150 Giants games a year. And I have  been a diehard for over 60 years. I dislike their approach. Aesthetically it’s awful. Which essentially is what Verducci is saying. And he’s hoping that this isn’t the baseball of the future. With which I could not agree more.

He’s not saying the Giants, as currently constructed, should not be taking this approach. In fact he gives Kapler and FZ credit for squeezing out wins. He’s saying the approach is fundamentally unsatisfying from a fans perspective. I agree with that. Completely.


Prior to the season, Buster Olney picked the Giants to finish 4th.  He added that from a fans perspective a major problem is that the Giants do not have a player that makes a 10 year old want to buy his jersey.  Simplistic.  But accurate. 

The Giants are my first sports love. I will always be a big fan. But I am nowhere near as invested in this team, as I’ve been in the past. Because, as I said, aesthetically, this is a very hard team to watch. Like Verducci I am hoping  that the Giants are not modeling baseball of the future.

Listened to Krukow for a few minutes driving back from walking the dog at the park. He was talking about the pretty much the same thing, and said baseball isn't coming back from where they are. . . .sad.

[cardcrimson]

Tom Verducci had a terrific article on the Giants being the most boring of the contenders.  He focused on the lack of stars, lack of athleticism and speed, the dependence on openers and bullpen games (Giants starters average the fewest number of pitches of any team.  It’s not close.). Constant lineup shuffling. Mix and match etc.  

He is spot on. I watch upwards of 150 Giants games a year. And I have  been a diehard for over 60 years. I dislike their approach. Aesthetically it’s awful. Which essentially is what Verducci is saying. And he’s hoping that this isn’t the baseball of the future. With which I could not agree more.

He’s not saying the Giants, as currently constructed, should not be taking this approach. In fact he gives Kapler and FZ credit for squeezing out wins. He’s saying the approach is fundamentally unsatisfying from a fans perspective. I agree with that. Completely.


Prior to the season, Buster Olney picked the Giants to finish 4th.  He added that from a fans perspective a major problem is that the Giants do not have a player that makes a 10 year old want to buy his jersey.  Simplistic.  But accurate. 

The Giants are my first sports love. I will always be a big fan. But I am nowhere near as invested in this team, as I’ve been in the past. Because, as I said, aesthetically, this is a very hard team to watch. Like Verducci I am hoping  that the Giants are not modeling baseball of the future.

Listened to Krukow for a few minutes driving back from walking the dog at the park. He was talking about the pretty much the same thing, and said baseball isn't coming back from where they are. . . .sad.