(12-13-2023, 12:26 PM)TrumpCard Wrote: I don't understand "proposed" Klay trades in which the Warriors get valuable assets. He's a mediocre player on a high-priced contract. The only "value" proposition is for a team trying to shed salary in future years by taking Klay's expiring contract. Donovan Mitchell, for example, is worth a lot to the Cavs as long as he's willing to stay, and he's worth multiple first rounders if he's leaving.
An expiring contract is no small thing, especially if Klay is packaged with another player. Here's the net/net offensive rating vs. defensive ratings for each Warriors player along with their NBA rank:
Rank, name, off rating minus def rating
65. Podziemski (+9.7)
121. Saric (+5.4)
134. Paul (+4.8)
146. Payton (+4.0)
163. Kuminga (+3.4)
then a substantial dropoff to...
275. Thompson (-1.2)
287. Moody (-1.9)
299. Curry (-2.6)
319. Looney (-4.4)
349. Green (-6.7)
370. Wiggins (-8.3)
That's a pretty grim list. Interesting how low Curry is, that Moody's net/net isn't positive, that Green's net/net is very low and Wiggins' net/net is terrible. 458 players are included in the stats. And I realize the built-in limitation that the starters are largely playing against starters, and the subs are largely playing against subs. Still...not good.
All data from www.nba.com, here's the link:
https://www.nba.com/stats/players/advanc...NET_RATING
Audaces fortuna iuvat
