[M T]

I only saw the 2nd half but what impressed me the most was that Iowa is not just Clark.  Their post is very agile and #24 can shoot.  And that guard #4 is very, very quick -- much quicker than anyone we have.  I didn't look at their heights but I have no idea who on our team would have the quickness and size to guard Clark.  Based on what I saw today, I don't think we would survive playing them in the tournament.

Green grass syndrome, I think.

#6 Iowa lost as many games as #4 Stanford (current rankings)
  11/19  58-65 #15     Kansas State    Clark: 24
  1/21   92-100 #2  @ Ohio State       Clark: 45
  2/11   79-82 (NR) @ Nebraska         Clark: 31
  2/22   69-86 #14  @ Indiana           Clark: 24

#4 Stanford
  12/3   78-96 @ #16 Gonzaga
  1/14   59-71 @ #13 Colorado
  2/2     58-67     #7 USC
  2/23   61-68  (NR) Arizona

WarrenNolan SOS ranks Stanford #2 and Iowa #21.   (Actually Stanford's opponents have a higher win percentage than SOS #1 So. Carolina.)

[M T]

I only saw the 2nd half but what impressed me the most was that Iowa is not just Clark.  Their post is very agile and #24 can shoot.  And that guard #4 is very, very quick -- much quicker than anyone we have.  I didn't look at their heights but I have no idea who on our team would have the quickness and size to guard Clark.  Based on what I saw today, I don't think we would survive playing them in the tournament.

Green grass syndrome, I think.

#6 Iowa lost as many games as #4 Stanford (current rankings)
  11/19  58-65 #15     Kansas State    Clark: 24
  1/21   92-100 #2  @ Ohio State       Clark: 45
  2/11   79-82 (NR) @ Nebraska         Clark: 31
  2/22   69-86 #14  @ Indiana           Clark: 24

#4 Stanford
  12/3   78-96 @ #16 Gonzaga
  1/14   59-71 @ #13 Colorado
  2/2     58-67     #7 USC
  2/23   61-68  (NR) Arizona

WarrenNolan SOS ranks Stanford #2 and Iowa #21.   (Actually Stanford's opponents have a higher win percentage than SOS #1 So. Carolina.)