[CTcard]

For the draft ... 

There seems to be a considerable range of opinion on Moore. That's a little surprising for a college player, but it does come after only two seasons - one of which was really rather less than expected. I have seen him projected from mid-first round to third round, though mostly late first. 

I haven't seen Nati listed on any draft projection at all. Such publicly available lists aren't that great for the later rounds, but it does mean that if Nati does get drafted it's unlikely to be very early.

The key to watch for Stanford fans is (hopefully) incoming frosh and Paly grad Charlie Bates. I have seen him ranked from around 50 to 150, but not sure if that factors in signability or not. Obviously, Stanford fans would like him to not sign regardless of where he gets drafted - even better if he just scares off teams telling them he's attending Stanford.

[CTcard]

For the draft ... 

There seems to be a considerable range of opinion on Moore. That's a little surprising for a college player, but it does come after only two seasons - one of which was really rather less than expected. I have seen him projected from mid-first round to third round, though mostly late first. 

I haven't seen Nati listed on any draft projection at all. Such publicly available lists aren't that great for the later rounds, but it does mean that if Nati does get drafted it's unlikely to be very early.

The key to watch for Stanford fans is (hopefully) incoming frosh and Paly grad Charlie Bates. I have seen him ranked from around 50 to 150, but not sure if that factors in signability or not. Obviously, Stanford fans would like him to not sign regardless of where he gets drafted - even better if he just scares off teams telling them he's attending Stanford.