[SkiBum80]

I read it quick & thought you said Coach was peeing on his play card

It's laminated, so nbd. Gotta keep that offensive whiz-ardry intact.

There FIFY - you're welcome.....
[/quote]
Ha ha great

---

We are a bad 2-7.  But for an end of game FG, we could have been 1-8.

Correct. Per Sagarin, before today, we would be the 4th best team in the Missouri Valley Conference and the 2nd or 3rd best in the Big Sky Conference.  No joke.  

People need to be reminded just how bad we are. It's human nature to root for these young men who are doing their best and have some talent, but this team may be worse than any Stanford Football team in history.  We were Sagarin #104 in 2006. We were Sagarin #104 through last week's games this season.

2024: http://sagarin.com/sports/cfsend.htm
2006: https://sagarin.usatoday.com/2019-2/2006...ings-2006/

So you’re saying this is a record setting team right?!

[SkiBum80]

I read it quick & thought you said Coach was peeing on his play card

It's laminated, so nbd. Gotta keep that offensive whiz-ardry intact.

There FIFY - you're welcome.....
[/quote]
Ha ha great

---

We are a bad 2-7.  But for an end of game FG, we could have been 1-8.

Correct. Per Sagarin, before today, we would be the 4th best team in the Missouri Valley Conference and the 2nd or 3rd best in the Big Sky Conference.  No joke.  

People need to be reminded just how bad we are. It's human nature to root for these young men who are doing their best and have some talent, but this team may be worse than any Stanford Football team in history.  We were Sagarin #104 in 2006. We were Sagarin #104 through last week's games this season.

2024: http://sagarin.com/sports/cfsend.htm
2006: https://sagarin.usatoday.com/2019-2/2006...ings-2006/

So you’re saying this is a record setting team right?!