11-08-2024, 07:01 PM
If you're going to attend, apparently Stanford is worried someone wili hijack Maples and fly it to Cuba. Metal detectors are in place. Pocket knives are not allowed. Stanford apparently doesn't post what is and isn't allowed, like the TSA does. Don't you just love this illogic from Stanford (2018)
Stanford vs WSU: Same song, 75th verse.
I did have a thought at the begining of the 2nd half that Stanford could still lose the game.
From the stands, it seemed like the team relaxed in the 2nd half and started playing looser & more productively. The assists shot up too. (1st half, only 4 on 31 FGA; second half, 12 on 34 FGA)
Of course Kate was going to bring in the rest of the players at the end, but with about 2:30 to go, I could see a possibility of 100 points again. Certainly, WSU got a bunch of points right at the end.
Encouragingly, all our quarters have had good shooting, so far.. FG% (3FG%) by quarter
Le Moyne 31.3 (45.5); 62.5 (70.0); 68.8 (40.0); 57.9 (50.0)
WSU 47.1 (75.0); 50.0 (75.0); 50.0 (85.7); 62.5 (40.0)
I thought it telling that one of the officials didn't know where a throw-in should be taken and had to be instructed where to position the player. Sigh...
Tthe OR% was 14/(14+21) = 40%. That's really good. But at least 2 of those were on FT rebounds.
DR% was 23/(23+8) = 74.2%. Ok.
Add them together for a simple (but questionable) number, 114.2 - a very good number.
I was impressed with the quickness of WSU's #5 Chiu. I thought she'd give us more trouble, but we did ok.
The claimed attendance of 2428 seems much higher than people in seats.
Quote:The process looks similar to airport screening, but our equipment is specifically calibrated to detect metal objects. Fans will not be asked to remove their belts, shoes or jackets before passing through the metal detector.The people operating them apparently are more concerned with what you put in the bowl rather than bothering to notice if you trigger the metal detector. An older lady went through in front of me and the lights triggered, but the attendant wasn't looking.
Stanford vs WSU: Same song, 75th verse.
I did have a thought at the begining of the 2nd half that Stanford could still lose the game.
From the stands, it seemed like the team relaxed in the 2nd half and started playing looser & more productively. The assists shot up too. (1st half, only 4 on 31 FGA; second half, 12 on 34 FGA)
Of course Kate was going to bring in the rest of the players at the end, but with about 2:30 to go, I could see a possibility of 100 points again. Certainly, WSU got a bunch of points right at the end.
Encouragingly, all our quarters have had good shooting, so far.. FG% (3FG%) by quarter
Le Moyne 31.3 (45.5); 62.5 (70.0); 68.8 (40.0); 57.9 (50.0)
WSU 47.1 (75.0); 50.0 (75.0); 50.0 (85.7); 62.5 (40.0)
(11-08-2024, 11:21 AM)OCcardinal Wrote: Stanford has shot over 70% for two games in a row. Since the 2009-10 season (as far back as Herhoopstats goes), Stanford has shot over 70% on 3s only 3 times.Sorry to bust your story, but against Le Moyne, Stanford shot 55.2% FG% and 52.9% 3FG%.
I thought it telling that one of the officials didn't know where a throw-in should be taken and had to be instructed where to position the player. Sigh...
Tthe OR% was 14/(14+21) = 40%. That's really good. But at least 2 of those were on FT rebounds.
DR% was 23/(23+8) = 74.2%. Ok.
Add them together for a simple (but questionable) number, 114.2 - a very good number.
I was impressed with the quickness of WSU's #5 Chiu. I thought she'd give us more trouble, but we did ok.
The claimed attendance of 2428 seems much higher than people in seats.
