(11-12-2024, 11:27 AM)MV72018 Wrote: Why is this still referred to as "Big Game"? It's a meaningless game, one that should see us get crushed once again, and that, for the sake of accuracy, should be renamed "Nano Game," referring both to its level of importance in the football cosmos and to the magnitude of our O output.
Once someone posts the banner hanging from the Bell Tower in Pisa in 1960*, we will be reminded why it is called the Big Game.
* a year in which the two teams came into the game with a cumulative 1-16-1 record. Also, 1960 was my first in-person Big Game.
