Who had a worse game? Stanford or the refs: Ed Sidlasky, Teresa Stuck, Esther Hsu
(Not Stanford)
Shooting by quarters FG% (3FG%)
46.7 (33.3) ; 26.7 (14.3) ; 52.9 (40.0) ; 50.0 (20.0)
A bad 2nd quarter. Q1 is about normal. Q3 was good. Q4 was slightly bad.
OR% 14/34 = 41.2%
DR% 27/31 = 87.1%
Total 128.3 Dominant
Although Stanford shot well in Q3, that is where Davis outscored Stanford. Why?
72.7%FG, 66.7%3FG, 8/9 FTs for UCDavis, (0/0 FT for Stanford.)
When the shooting is like that, rebounding follows. Davis got 1 OR + 7 DR while Stanford got 1 OR + 2 DR.
---
None of the 3 refs has ever called a Stanford game in the NCAA tourney. Since Stanford's "new" web site has no history, I can't search Stanford's records.
Sidlasky's been around a long time, but the only NCAA West games he's reffed were almost all East Coast teams (Fl. Gulf Coast x 2, Maryland, Va Tech, DePaul, Tx A&M x 2, Drake, Florida State, Western Illinois.) The other two refs are far less experienced. Hsu has done only 3 post season games (NIT) 2016 and later. Stuck has only done 3 NITs and one NCAA game starting in 2019.
I guess these refs drew the short stick and had to fly across the country.
----
Re "If Davis can do it with their personnel, there is no reason Indiana, Morgan State, Cal Poly and the whole future schedule can't play it."
Are those other teams facing the Princeton offense every day in practice? One builds up instincts by practice.
Re "Obviously Agara's offense was the key to victory,"
I disagree... We held their score down by 21 points over their previous game. DEFENSE is why Stanford won. Rebounding differential was a big part of that.
Look at the 3rd quarter. Our defense failed us there. Perhaps the officiating contributed to the defensive problems in that quarter.
---
Re whoever said that Kate was outcoached....,.... Look at the difference between the 3rd and 4th quarters.
----
Oh wait, there's the difference! BobK had to watch from home. The team needed your cheering, Bob!
(Not Stanford)
Shooting by quarters FG% (3FG%)
46.7 (33.3) ; 26.7 (14.3) ; 52.9 (40.0) ; 50.0 (20.0)
A bad 2nd quarter. Q1 is about normal. Q3 was good. Q4 was slightly bad.
OR% 14/34 = 41.2%
DR% 27/31 = 87.1%
Total 128.3 Dominant
Although Stanford shot well in Q3, that is where Davis outscored Stanford. Why?
72.7%FG, 66.7%3FG, 8/9 FTs for UCDavis, (0/0 FT for Stanford.)
When the shooting is like that, rebounding follows. Davis got 1 OR + 7 DR while Stanford got 1 OR + 2 DR.
---
None of the 3 refs has ever called a Stanford game in the NCAA tourney. Since Stanford's "new" web site has no history, I can't search Stanford's records.
Sidlasky's been around a long time, but the only NCAA West games he's reffed were almost all East Coast teams (Fl. Gulf Coast x 2, Maryland, Va Tech, DePaul, Tx A&M x 2, Drake, Florida State, Western Illinois.) The other two refs are far less experienced. Hsu has done only 3 post season games (NIT) 2016 and later. Stuck has only done 3 NITs and one NCAA game starting in 2019.
I guess these refs drew the short stick and had to fly across the country.
----
Re "If Davis can do it with their personnel, there is no reason Indiana, Morgan State, Cal Poly and the whole future schedule can't play it."
Are those other teams facing the Princeton offense every day in practice? One builds up instincts by practice.
Re "Obviously Agara's offense was the key to victory,"
I disagree... We held their score down by 21 points over their previous game. DEFENSE is why Stanford won. Rebounding differential was a big part of that.
Look at the 3rd quarter. Our defense failed us there. Perhaps the officiating contributed to the defensive problems in that quarter.
---
Re whoever said that Kate was outcoached....,.... Look at the difference between the 3rd and 4th quarters.
----
Oh wait, there's the difference! BobK had to watch from home. The team needed your cheering, Bob!