https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FlVSWd8uisg
While the committee chair went through some reasons for their decision regarding Stanford or Louisville as a #1 regional seed I felt she could have given a better explanation. She said they watched the Stanford/Louisville match. It seems to me the committee members wouldn't spend so much time on one match if they didn't think it would be an important factor.
In many televised matches I listened to announcers say how important the KPI would be this year. Stanford had a better KPI than Louisville. I would have liked for the committee chair to address how important or not important the KPI was to the committee.
"The KPI is an enhanced selection criteria compared to the current RPI system. The RPI rankings does not factor items like margin of victory or match location into its mathematical equation."
Oh well, I'm looking forward to an exciting volleyball tournament and remain optimistic about Stanford doing well.
While the committee chair went through some reasons for their decision regarding Stanford or Louisville as a #1 regional seed I felt she could have given a better explanation. She said they watched the Stanford/Louisville match. It seems to me the committee members wouldn't spend so much time on one match if they didn't think it would be an important factor.
In many televised matches I listened to announcers say how important the KPI would be this year. Stanford had a better KPI than Louisville. I would have liked for the committee chair to address how important or not important the KPI was to the committee.
"The KPI is an enhanced selection criteria compared to the current RPI system. The RPI rankings does not factor items like margin of victory or match location into its mathematical equation."
Oh well, I'm looking forward to an exciting volleyball tournament and remain optimistic about Stanford doing well.