[Giants]

I don't know, while one might disagree with excluding known PED users from the hall of fame, I don't know how it is a reason that makes no sense.  Lots of people agree with you (for example, Bonds appeared on 66% of ballots in his last go around), but enough voters believe that PEDs are an absolute disqualification that he did not get in.

BC

I do not understand how some voters can claim the moral high ground when there is no way anyone can absolutely say all players elected in the modern era disdained the use of PED’s.  That is what makes no sense to me.

[Giants]

I don't know, while one might disagree with excluding known PED users from the hall of fame, I don't know how it is a reason that makes no sense.  Lots of people agree with you (for example, Bonds appeared on 66% of ballots in his last go around), but enough voters believe that PEDs are an absolute disqualification that he did not get in.

BC

I do not understand how some voters can claim the moral high ground when there is no way anyone can absolutely say all players elected in the modern era disdained the use of PED’s.  That is what makes no sense to me.