[PalmTree]

There were a large number of layoffs within DAPER last week. I didn't see most of them on the filing.

Can you document this?  A quick search didn’t show any mention of this. I don’t know that such layoffs would need to be in such a filing, but I would think so

WARN filing is required if 50 or more employees are involved - I could see the layoffs occuring without being "documented" if the #s were below 50, plus the timelines are different

But why wouldn't Stanford bundle Athletic Department layoffs into this WARN filing?  It certainly is a bad look that they laid off so many in so many areas but essentially didn't touch Athletics.   I imagine the Faculty Senate would question the administration over this.

If we had any documentation of the numbers, if any, laid off in Athletics, then that would be one thing, but right now, I've not seen any.

Well, we really have no way of knowing where <any> of the layoffs took place, do we?

[PalmTree]

There were a large number of layoffs within DAPER last week. I didn't see most of them on the filing.

Can you document this?  A quick search didn’t show any mention of this. I don’t know that such layoffs would need to be in such a filing, but I would think so

WARN filing is required if 50 or more employees are involved - I could see the layoffs occuring without being "documented" if the #s were below 50, plus the timelines are different

But why wouldn't Stanford bundle Athletic Department layoffs into this WARN filing?  It certainly is a bad look that they laid off so many in so many areas but essentially didn't touch Athletics.   I imagine the Faculty Senate would question the administration over this.

If we had any documentation of the numbers, if any, laid off in Athletics, then that would be one thing, but right now, I've not seen any.

Well, we really have no way of knowing where <any> of the layoffs took place, do we?