06-03-2013, 10:39 AM
To build on Roberton3's point, Stanford's depth is greater than most teams in the BCS. Murphy is the "alpha dog" of the group, but even he will get subbed in for a lot, especially if Stanford has sizable leads in games.
Stanford's front seven depth all will get in on the "party in the backfield" and so too will a few DBs. What might be a fun exercise is the O/U on how many Stanford players register sacks in 2013?
If you consider these guys among the more likely suspects:Â Gardner, H. Anderson, Parry, Mauro, Shittu, Watkins, Nwafor, Murphy, Lueders, Skov, Tarpley, Vaughters, K. Anderson, Lancaster, Martinez, Amanam, Richards, Carter, Lyons, Davis.
That's 20 guys. If the O/U on Stanford defenders with at least one sack is 12, do you take the Over or the Under? I think I'd take the over.
Stanford's front seven depth all will get in on the "party in the backfield" and so too will a few DBs. What might be a fun exercise is the O/U on how many Stanford players register sacks in 2013?
If you consider these guys among the more likely suspects:Â Gardner, H. Anderson, Parry, Mauro, Shittu, Watkins, Nwafor, Murphy, Lueders, Skov, Tarpley, Vaughters, K. Anderson, Lancaster, Martinez, Amanam, Richards, Carter, Lyons, Davis.
That's 20 guys. If the O/U on Stanford defenders with at least one sack is 12, do you take the Over or the Under? I think I'd take the over.