Yvonne,
Only a fool thinks the "good times" will last "years on end" and, God knows, there are many fools who populate that site. That is why many of the old timers no longer post there.Â
Re: UCLA and better student athletes. You are correct if you narrow your focus to the last 5-7 years. Prior to that (the early Tedford years), Berkeley was signing better student athletes than UCLA. In one year (I believe, 06), Berkeley hit the 100% mark re: APR. As I mentioned earlier, moving away from that philosophy was ruinous.
Only a fool thinks the "good times" will last "years on end" and, God knows, there are many fools who populate that site. That is why many of the old timers no longer post there.Â
Re: UCLA and better student athletes. You are correct if you narrow your focus to the last 5-7 years. Prior to that (the early Tedford years), Berkeley was signing better student athletes than UCLA. In one year (I believe, 06), Berkeley hit the 100% mark re: APR. As I mentioned earlier, moving away from that philosophy was ruinous.