[JustAnotherFan]

Hope he can play safety.

"The 6-foot, 175-pound Graham played both quarterback and wide receiver for Mountain Island Charter School last season and is thought to project as a wide receiver or cornerback for the Badgers."

https://madison.com/wsj/sports/college/f...dfbd6.html

[JustAnotherFan]

Hope he can play safety.

"The 6-foot, 175-pound Graham played both quarterback and wide receiver for Mountain Island Charter School last season and is thought to project as a wide receiver or cornerback for the Badgers."

https://madison.com/wsj/sports/college/f...dfbd6.html

[TinderForMidgets]

Hope he can play safety.

"The 6-foot, 175-pound Graham played both quarterback and wide receiver for Mountain Island Charter School last season and is thought to project as a wide receiver or cornerback for the Badgers."

https://madison.com/wsj/sports/college/f...dfbd6.html

From Steve Wiltfong

"Graham is commit No. 14 for Stanford in 2019 and will play receiver in Palo Alto. He has done a virtual tour and will take his official in January."

[TinderForMidgets]

Hope he can play safety.

"The 6-foot, 175-pound Graham played both quarterback and wide receiver for Mountain Island Charter School last season and is thought to project as a wide receiver or cornerback for the Badgers."

https://madison.com/wsj/sports/college/f...dfbd6.html

From Steve Wiltfong

"Graham is commit No. 14 for Stanford in 2019 and will play receiver in Palo Alto. He has done a virtual tour and will take his official in January."

[BostonCard]

There's our stealth.

BC

[BostonCard]

There's our stealth.

BC

[Phogge]

Need a stealth Jordan Richards or a stealth Delano Howell. Or a stealth Jim Kaufman.

[Phogge]

Need a stealth Jordan Richards or a stealth Delano Howell. Or a stealth Jim Kaufman.

[SamuelMcF]

There's our stealth.

BC

This implies there was only one stealth... ;)

[SamuelMcF]

There's our stealth.

BC

This implies there was only one stealth... ;)

[OutsiderFan]

Kind of surprised this Graham kid doesn't have more Power 5 offers. He clearly has the speed and quickness you want in a DB/WR.

[OutsiderFan]

Kind of surprised this Graham kid doesn't have more Power 5 offers. He clearly has the speed and quickness you want in a DB/WR.

[BobK]

11.64 isn’t speed to me outsider :)

[BobK]

11.64 isn’t speed to me outsider :)

[OutsiderFan]

11.64 isn’t speed to me outsider :)

He looks faster than that if 11.64 is his 100M time. And if he is that slow, why would Stanford recruit him?

[OutsiderFan]

11.64 isn’t speed to me outsider :)

He looks faster than that if 11.64 is his 100M time. And if he is that slow, why would Stanford recruit him?

[rudruff]

11.64 isn’t speed to me outsider :)

He looks faster than that if 11.64 is his 100M time. And if he is that slow, why would Stanford recruit him?

Hoping it's his 200m time.

[rudruff]

11.64 isn’t speed to me outsider :)

He looks faster than that if 11.64 is his 100M time. And if he is that slow, why would Stanford recruit him?

Hoping it's his 200m time.

[OutsiderFan]

Well, Bob, looks like Stanford has passed on your guy Larrier.  Probably ends up at Cal now.

It seems this would portend Higgins choosing Stanford.

[OutsiderFan]

Well, Bob, looks like Stanford has passed on your guy Larrier.  Probably ends up at Cal now.

It seems this would portend Higgins choosing Stanford.

[BobK]

Actually we haven’t passed on Larrier yet. Higgins very possible

[BobK]

Actually we haven’t passed on Larrier yet. Higgins very possible

[ChicagoCard]

Actually we haven’t passed on Larrier yet.   Higgins  very possible

<rant> I wish people with weak to outright wrong info would go post on the other sites </rant>

[ChicagoCard]

Actually we haven’t passed on Larrier yet.   Higgins  very possible

<rant> I wish people with weak to outright wrong info would go post on the other sites </rant>

[CompSci87]

Actually we haven’t passed on Larrier yet.   Higgins  very possible

<rant> I wish people with weak to outright wrong info would go post on the other sites </rant>

Are you referring to the post you quoted or the one it was responding to? Or neither? Or both?

[CompSci87]

Actually we haven’t passed on Larrier yet.   Higgins  very possible

<rant> I wish people with weak to outright wrong info would go post on the other sites </rant>

Are you referring to the post you quoted or the one it was responding to? Or neither? Or both?

[Phogge]

Now Bobbbbb, don’t get cranky with the young ‘uns.

[Phogge]

Now Bobbbbb, don’t get cranky with the young ‘uns.

[ChicagoCard]

That was partly due to my laziness. Clearly, I thought, I was referring to being led to believe that the wide receiver Larrier was out of play. I wasn't questioning Bob who is clearly very well-informed, and polite. Anyway, it wasn't Bob who chimed in, it was CompSci wasn't it? P.s. thanks for pointing that out. I should have edited it unprompted.

[ChicagoCard]

That was partly due to my laziness. Clearly, I thought, I was referring to being led to believe that the wide receiver Larrier was out of play. I wasn't questioning Bob who is clearly very well-informed, and polite. Anyway, it wasn't Bob who chimed in, it was CompSci wasn't it? P.s. thanks for pointing that out. I should have edited it unprompted.

[BobK]

cant t get upset it went over my head.

[BobK]

cant t get upset it went over my head.

[ChicagoCard]

cant t get upset it went over my head.

I wasn't referring to you Bob. I probably should have kept my mouth shut. Nothing good to say, don't say anything...

[ChicagoCard]

cant t get upset it went over my head.

I wasn't referring to you Bob. I probably should have kept my mouth shut. Nothing good to say, don't say anything...

[BobK]

Whew. I feel better. Lol. Thanks chi card

[BobK]

Whew. I feel better. Lol. Thanks chi card

[ChicagoCard]

Whew.   I feel better. Lol. Thanks chi card

Going back to my ill-advised comment, I spent some time on one of the other sites earlier this year. There's a lot of good info if you can learn to distinguish between contributors (and remain disciplined about not trusting loudmouths). At one point multiple contributors became adamant that one of the defensive linemen was never going to play a snap, and it would be just a matter of time before being removed from the roster. Well, he's still on the roster and, unless another player took his number, saw action against Oregon St.

[ChicagoCard]

Whew.   I feel better. Lol. Thanks chi card

Going back to my ill-advised comment, I spent some time on one of the other sites earlier this year. There's a lot of good info if you can learn to distinguish between contributors (and remain disciplined about not trusting loudmouths). At one point multiple contributors became adamant that one of the defensive linemen was never going to play a snap, and it would be just a matter of time before being removed from the roster. Well, he's still on the roster and, unless another player took his number, saw action against Oregon St.

[SamuelMcF]

Going back to my ill-advised comment, I spent some time on one of the other sites earlier this year. There's a lot of good info if you can learn to distinguish between contributors (and remain disciplined about not trusting loudmouths). At one point multiple contributors became adamant that one of the defensive linemen was never going to play a snap, and it would be just a matter of time before being removed from the roster. Well, he's still on the roster and, unless another player took his number, saw action against Oregon St.

Want to own up real quick; I think one of those posts was by me. Said defensive lineman was standing in the student section a few rows below me in the middle of the $C game, so I thought he was off the team. Happy to have been wrong about it.

[SamuelMcF]

Going back to my ill-advised comment, I spent some time on one of the other sites earlier this year. There's a lot of good info if you can learn to distinguish between contributors (and remain disciplined about not trusting loudmouths). At one point multiple contributors became adamant that one of the defensive linemen was never going to play a snap, and it would be just a matter of time before being removed from the roster. Well, he's still on the roster and, unless another player took his number, saw action against Oregon St.

Want to own up real quick; I think one of those posts was by me. Said defensive lineman was standing in the student section a few rows below me in the middle of the $C game, so I thought he was off the team. Happy to have been wrong about it.