08-27-2018, 12:53 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-27-2018, 12:55 PM by SteveAztec.)
Aztecs Depth Chart
08-27-2018, 01:32 PM
SteveAztec - to your observation, is this accurate? I noticed that the ourlads depth chart for Stanford lists injured players who are not expected to participate vs. SDSU.
(08-27-2018, 12:53 PM)SteveAztec Wrote: http://www.ourlads.com/ncaa-football-dep...ate/91786/
"We have an unwritten rule around here not to do anything stupid."
-Casey Jacobsen, Feb 3, 2000
SteveAztec - to your observation, is this accurate? I noticed that the ourlads depth chart for Stanford lists injured players who are not expected to participate vs. SDSU.
(08-27-2018, 12:53 PM)SteveAztec Wrote: http://www.ourlads.com/ncaa-football-dep...ate/91786/
"We have an unwritten rule around here not to do anything stupid."
-Casey Jacobsen, Feb 3, 2000
(08-27-2018, 01:32 PM)Spiny_Norman Wrote: SteveAztec - to your observation, is this accurate? I noticed that the ourlads depth chart for Stanford lists injured players who are not expected to participate vs. SDSU.
(08-27-2018, 12:53 PM)SteveAztec Wrote: http://www.ourlads.com/ncaa-football-dep...ate/91786/
The Stanford depth chart was last updated over a month ago (hence multiple errors), as was SDSU's.
Found a link to their officially released depth chart here: https://goaztecs.com/documents/2018/8/26...anford.pdf
(08-27-2018, 01:32 PM)Spiny_Norman Wrote: SteveAztec - to your observation, is this accurate? I noticed that the ourlads depth chart for Stanford lists injured players who are not expected to participate vs. SDSU.
(08-27-2018, 12:53 PM)SteveAztec Wrote: http://www.ourlads.com/ncaa-football-dep...ate/91786/
The Stanford depth chart was last updated over a month ago (hence multiple errors), as was SDSU's.
Found a link to their officially released depth chart here: https://goaztecs.com/documents/2018/8/26...anford.pdf
Interesting to see how small the SDSU DL is. Nobody over 270 on the 2-deep.
08-27-2018, 03:35 PM
(08-27-2018, 01:49 PM)OutsiderFan Wrote: Interesting to see how small the SDSU DL is. Nobody over 270 on the 2-deep.
whereas the OL looks big (and experienced, with all 5 starters returning)
not sure I've ever seen an 8th string TE before!?!
He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. - John Stuart Mill
(08-27-2018, 01:49 PM)OutsiderFan Wrote: Interesting to see how small the SDSU DL is. Nobody over 270 on the 2-deep.
whereas the OL looks big (and experienced, with all 5 starters returning)
not sure I've ever seen an 8th string TE before!?!
He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. - John Stuart Mill
08-27-2018, 06:52 PM
(08-27-2018, 03:35 PM)LuckE2Bhere Wrote: not sure I've ever seen an 8th string TE before!?!
That's really quite a depth chart.
Through 11th string on the Z receiver.
Along with returning starters at BOTH short and long snapper positions.
Really makes me wonder about the depth disaster at RG with only two on their two-deep.
It seems it's "depth chart spot for everyone".
(08-27-2018, 03:35 PM)LuckE2Bhere Wrote: not sure I've ever seen an 8th string TE before!?!
That's really quite a depth chart.
Through 11th string on the Z receiver.
Along with returning starters at BOTH short and long snapper positions.
Really makes me wonder about the depth disaster at RG with only two on their two-deep.
It seems it's "depth chart spot for everyone".
08-27-2018, 10:55 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-27-2018, 10:58 PM by SteveAztec.)
(08-27-2018, 01:32 PM)Spiny_Norman Wrote: SteveAztec - to your observation, is this accurate? I noticed that the ourlads depth chart for Stanford lists injured players who are not expected to participate vs. SDSU.
(08-27-2018, 12:53 PM)SteveAztec Wrote: http://www.ourlads.com/ncaa-football-dep...ate/91786/
Yes...I do think it is fairly accurate. I know the Aztecs (according to Rocky Long) came out of recent practices with no major injuries at key positions.
We did have a couple of defections from the program, but not 2 deep and only a couple of minor injuries.
(08-27-2018, 01:49 PM)OutsiderFan Wrote: Interesting to see how small the SDSU DL is. Nobody over 270 on the 2-deep.
Yes, very small. Hey, all the big D Lineman sign with P5 schools.
Therefore the Aztecs go small and quick. And that would be the 3-5-5 defense that the Aztec defense have. It is built on speed, instead of power.
(This post was last modified: 08-27-2018, 10:58 PM by SteveAztec.)
(08-27-2018, 01:32 PM)Spiny_Norman Wrote: SteveAztec - to your observation, is this accurate? I noticed that the ourlads depth chart for Stanford lists injured players who are not expected to participate vs. SDSU.
(08-27-2018, 12:53 PM)SteveAztec Wrote: http://www.ourlads.com/ncaa-football-dep...ate/91786/
Yes...I do think it is fairly accurate. I know the Aztecs (according to Rocky Long) came out of recent practices with no major injuries at key positions.
We did have a couple of defections from the program, but not 2 deep and only a couple of minor injuries.
(08-27-2018, 01:49 PM)OutsiderFan Wrote: Interesting to see how small the SDSU DL is. Nobody over 270 on the 2-deep.
Yes, very small. Hey, all the big D Lineman sign with P5 schools.
Therefore the Aztecs go small and quick. And that would be the 3-5-5 defense that the Aztec defense have. It is built on speed, instead of power.
08-28-2018, 12:09 AM
(08-27-2018, 11:08 PM)SamuelMcF Wrote:(08-27-2018, 10:55 PM)SteveAztec Wrote: Therefore the Aztecs go small and quick. And that would be the 3-5-5 defense that the Aztec defense have. It is built on speed, instead of power.
And 13 men on the field; why didn't we think of that?!
LOL, we might yet need that configuration.
(08-27-2018, 11:08 PM)SamuelMcF Wrote:(08-27-2018, 10:55 PM)SteveAztec Wrote: Therefore the Aztecs go small and quick. And that would be the 3-5-5 defense that the Aztec defense have. It is built on speed, instead of power.
And 13 men on the field; why didn't we think of that?!
LOL, we might yet need that configuration.
08-28-2018, 01:38 PM
(08-27-2018, 11:08 PM)SamuelMcF Wrote:(08-27-2018, 10:55 PM)SteveAztec Wrote: Therefore the Aztecs go small and quick. And that would be the 3-5-5 defense that the Aztec defense have. It is built on speed, instead of power.
And 13 men on the field; why didn't we think of that?!
Hard to beat 13, isn't it. Ha
Correction 3-3-5
(08-27-2018, 11:08 PM)SamuelMcF Wrote:(08-27-2018, 10:55 PM)SteveAztec Wrote: Therefore the Aztecs go small and quick. And that would be the 3-5-5 defense that the Aztec defense have. It is built on speed, instead of power.
And 13 men on the field; why didn't we think of that?!
Hard to beat 13, isn't it. Ha
Correction 3-3-5
09-01-2018, 10:26 PM
(08-27-2018, 11:08 PM)SamuelMcF Wrote:(08-27-2018, 10:55 PM)SteveAztec Wrote: Therefore the Aztecs go small and quick. And that would be the 3-5-5 defense that the Aztec defense have. It is built on speed, instead of power.
And 13 men on the field; why didn't we think of that?!
It looks like we needed those 13 men.
(08-27-2018, 11:08 PM)SamuelMcF Wrote:(08-27-2018, 10:55 PM)SteveAztec Wrote: Therefore the Aztecs go small and quick. And that would be the 3-5-5 defense that the Aztec defense have. It is built on speed, instead of power.
And 13 men on the field; why didn't we think of that?!
It looks like we needed those 13 men.
(09-01-2018, 10:26 PM)SteveAztec Wrote:(08-27-2018, 11:08 PM)SamuelMcF Wrote:(08-27-2018, 10:55 PM)SteveAztec Wrote: Therefore the Aztecs go small and quick. And that would be the 3-5-5 defense that the Aztec defense have. It is built on speed, instead of power.
And 13 men on the field; why didn't we think of that?!
It looks like we needed those 13 men.
Not to stop our run game. Good luck with the season.
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
(09-01-2018, 10:26 PM)SteveAztec Wrote:(08-27-2018, 11:08 PM)SamuelMcF Wrote:(08-27-2018, 10:55 PM)SteveAztec Wrote: Therefore the Aztecs go small and quick. And that would be the 3-5-5 defense that the Aztec defense have. It is built on speed, instead of power.
And 13 men on the field; why didn't we think of that?!
It looks like we needed those 13 men.
Not to stop our run game. Good luck with the season.
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »