09-07-2019, 10:24 PM
What's the opposite of turtling?
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
Next Starts Now (Stanford @ USC Game Thread)
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
09-07-2019, 10:24 PM
(09-07-2019, 10:22 PM)BostonCard Wrote: Hard not to see us 1-3 after 4 games.
BC
I wouldn't write us off next week so soon. KJ is back,
and UCF's RB and WR are not of SC's quality.
And we play Oregon at home. This team has played very well
at home for most part.
Let's take it a week at a time.
09-07-2019, 10:28 PM
Ineffective run game killing us... so many wasted plays.. I know you need to keep D guessing but you can do that with variation in passing plays... the run game has not worked since 1stQ... I love Shaw but needs to adapt to flow of game...
Ineffective run game killing us... so many wasted plays.. I know you need to keep D guessing but you can do that with variation in passing plays... the run game has not worked since 1stQ... I love Shaw but needs to adapt to flow of game...
09-07-2019, 10:31 PM
(09-07-2019, 10:24 PM)d4cohn Wrote:(09-07-2019, 10:22 PM)BostonCard Wrote: Hard not to see us 1-3 after 4 games.
BC
I wouldn't write us off next week so soon. KJ is back,
and UCF's RB and WR are not of SC's quality.
And we play Oregon at home. This team has played very well
at home for most part.
Let's take it a week at a time.
I mean, sure. But this is looking like a limited team. Too many holes in the places we were worried about at the start of the year. Offensive line was thin and we lost our best tackle. Safety was weak and inexperienced and has been exposed by USC. Inside linebacker was inexperienced, and has done nothing to reassure us. Our running backs are merely ok. Our receivers are talented but young and a step down from last year. Párkinson hasn’t quite stepped up to be a top tight end. And today, the d-line, the one place where I thought we were going to shine, has just plain sucked.
BC
(09-07-2019, 10:24 PM)d4cohn Wrote:(09-07-2019, 10:22 PM)BostonCard Wrote: Hard not to see us 1-3 after 4 games.
BC
I wouldn't write us off next week so soon. KJ is back,
and UCF's RB and WR are not of SC's quality.
And we play Oregon at home. This team has played very well
at home for most part.
Let's take it a week at a time.
I mean, sure. But this is looking like a limited team. Too many holes in the places we were worried about at the start of the year. Offensive line was thin and we lost our best tackle. Safety was weak and inexperienced and has been exposed by USC. Inside linebacker was inexperienced, and has done nothing to reassure us. Our running backs are merely ok. Our receivers are talented but young and a step down from last year. Párkinson hasn’t quite stepped up to be a top tight end. And today, the d-line, the one place where I thought we were going to shine, has just plain sucked.
BC
09-07-2019, 10:31 PM
The safety play has been awful tonight. #3 with a poor angle
among other things on that play. #22 gets burned with speed.
among other things on that play. #22 gets burned with speed.
09-07-2019, 10:31 PM
Oh my goodness... can our DBs focus on maintaining inside allignments for once to reduce effective of slants... ADJUST to game?!
Oh my goodness... can our DBs focus on maintaining inside allignments for once to reduce effective of slants... ADJUST to game?!
09-07-2019, 10:32 PM
Worst Mazda commercial I've ever seen.
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
09-07-2019, 10:32 PM
(09-07-2019, 10:23 PM)UK Cardinal Wrote: We have been 2nd best since beginning of 2nd Q in every dept... gotta take this one on the chin... frustrating because feels like this game was winnable but giving up this many points and not executing efficiently on O/ST for most of game just not good enough to beat even a mid level team...
Even early on, they did not take full advantage of the opportunities and Stanford was clearly not prepared for USC's new look offense.
(09-07-2019, 10:23 PM)UK Cardinal Wrote: We have been 2nd best since beginning of 2nd Q in every dept... gotta take this one on the chin... frustrating because feels like this game was winnable but giving up this many points and not executing efficiently on O/ST for most of game just not good enough to beat even a mid level team...
Even early on, they did not take full advantage of the opportunities and Stanford was clearly not prepared for USC's new look offense.
09-07-2019, 10:33 PM
Is the UW game cancelled?
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
09-07-2019, 10:33 PM
(09-07-2019, 10:31 PM)BostonCard Wrote:(09-07-2019, 10:24 PM)d4cohn Wrote:(09-07-2019, 10:22 PM)BostonCard Wrote: Hard not to see us 1-3 after 4 games.
BC
I wouldn't write us off next week so soon. KJ is back,
and UCF's RB and WR are not of SC's quality.
And we play Oregon at home. This team has played very well
at home for most part.
Let's take it a week at a time.
I mean, sure. But this is looking like a limited team. Too many holes in the places we were worried about at the start of the year. Offensive line was thin and we lost our best tackle. Safety was weak and inexperienced and has been exposed by USC. Inside linebacker was inexperienced, and has done nothing to reassure us. Our running backs are merely ok. Our receivers are talented but young and a step down from last year. Párkinson hasn’t quite stepped up to be a top tight end. And today, the d-line, the one place where I thought we were going to shine, has just plain sucked.
BC
Safety stood out on tape last week (more backup safety, but still), but it was a red flag even against NW. Against a team with SC's speed,
weaknesses at safety become magnified.
(09-07-2019, 10:31 PM)BostonCard Wrote:(09-07-2019, 10:24 PM)d4cohn Wrote:(09-07-2019, 10:22 PM)BostonCard Wrote: Hard not to see us 1-3 after 4 games.
BC
I wouldn't write us off next week so soon. KJ is back,
and UCF's RB and WR are not of SC's quality.
And we play Oregon at home. This team has played very well
at home for most part.
Let's take it a week at a time.
I mean, sure. But this is looking like a limited team. Too many holes in the places we were worried about at the start of the year. Offensive line was thin and we lost our best tackle. Safety was weak and inexperienced and has been exposed by USC. Inside linebacker was inexperienced, and has done nothing to reassure us. Our running backs are merely ok. Our receivers are talented but young and a step down from last year. Párkinson hasn’t quite stepped up to be a top tight end. And today, the d-line, the one place where I thought we were going to shine, has just plain sucked.
BC
Safety stood out on tape last week (more backup safety, but still), but it was a red flag even against NW. Against a team with SC's speed,
weaknesses at safety become magnified.
09-07-2019, 10:34 PM
09-07-2019, 10:34 PM
Just checking- has Mills checked out of many plays tonight? Because it seems like he’s running the called play come hell or high water. And not coming off his primary receiver as well.
That fourth down play was running into an 8 man box with only six blockers. Felt like Shaw’s halfway compromise to trying a spread out offense for short yardage, and worked about as well as I’d expect.
VG
That fourth down play was running into an 8 man box with only six blockers. Felt like Shaw’s halfway compromise to trying a spread out offense for short yardage, and worked about as well as I’d expect.
VG
Just checking- has Mills checked out of many plays tonight? Because it seems like he’s running the called play come hell or high water. And not coming off his primary receiver as well.
That fourth down play was running into an 8 man box with only six blockers. Felt like Shaw’s halfway compromise to trying a spread out offense for short yardage, and worked about as well as I’d expect.
VG
That fourth down play was running into an 8 man box with only six blockers. Felt like Shaw’s halfway compromise to trying a spread out offense for short yardage, and worked about as well as I’d expect.
VG
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »