09-04-2020, 03:56 PM
So, under normal circumstances, a pharma company will propose a threshold of efficacy and safety data that would support a particular indication, and the Agency will (often) push back, either demanding a larger safety database, or more robust evidence of efficacy. Now it looks like that relationship has been turned on its head.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/...f=leQ3i2ya
With the Agency (under pressure from the administration) all but begging vaccine makers to bring a vaccine for EUA by late October (gee, I wonder why might that date be important?), the makers are pushing back, publicly pledging that they won't send the data for review without "extensive" safety and efficacy data.
Trump deserves a lot of credit for really pulling out all the stops to get a vaccine for COVID to where it is now and possibly to approval before the end of the year. Whether it gets approved before November 3 or after is really beside the point, because it is starting to look increasingly likely that something people said would take 12 to 18 months if everything went right could be accomplished in less time than that. Trump has done a lot of things wrong, but putting government muscle into accelerating vaccine development is one thing he's exceeded my expectations. I just hope he doesn't blow this by pushing an artificial deadline related to the political calendar at it.
BC
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/...f=leQ3i2ya
With the Agency (under pressure from the administration) all but begging vaccine makers to bring a vaccine for EUA by late October (gee, I wonder why might that date be important?), the makers are pushing back, publicly pledging that they won't send the data for review without "extensive" safety and efficacy data.
Trump deserves a lot of credit for really pulling out all the stops to get a vaccine for COVID to where it is now and possibly to approval before the end of the year. Whether it gets approved before November 3 or after is really beside the point, because it is starting to look increasingly likely that something people said would take 12 to 18 months if everything went right could be accomplished in less time than that. Trump has done a lot of things wrong, but putting government muscle into accelerating vaccine development is one thing he's exceeded my expectations. I just hope he doesn't blow this by pushing an artificial deadline related to the political calendar at it.
BC
