Posts: 130
Threads: 5
Joined: Jan 2021
Hey Gang. Hi to Bob K and many others!
Long time member of TOS (where I am "MizzouCard") who still hangs out there. Son MiniMizzouCard advised me of the CARDboard some time ago. I have been lurking here every once in a while, though a new job does not leave me as much time as I would like for Stanford sports. Much enjoy the conversation here, even when I disagree with the views of some (as in this post), as it is fun to be among rabidly passionate Stanford sports fans. Have been tempted to post here before on several occasions, but have resisted until today as time really is limited so it is probably a mistake for me to take the step from lurker to poster.
FWIW, I enjoy Kevin Danna's work and I enjoyed listening to him on yesterday's game. As a big Stanford baseball fan, I have benefitted from his work many times in the past. I think he does a very good job of letting us know about game situations, which is the primary of the play be play announcer. He also, in my mind, does a good job of balancing his love for the Cardinal with his duty to be neutral. That generally tilts more toward the former on his Stanford baseball gigs than it did yesterday, but that is entirely appropriate. In my opinion, Casey Jakes and he did a great job on yesterday's game, especially under the unusual circumstances of a game in an empty gym and announcers presumably in their own homes or offices.
Admittedly, I am biased, as I also like the broadcasting work of Dave Fleming, Troy Clardy, RGO, Coach Monty, etc. Stanford is rather "sui generis," as we lawyers like to say, so I believe it helps when announcers have an insider's understanding of that reality. [I can still develop a good rage when I think about the late Craig Sager's (sp?) pre-game blast at Stanford for not admitting Reggie Bush, who claimed that Stanford was his dream school. Just an example, but a very good one, of the many sports announcers who do not understand Stanford. I consider us fortunate when we have someone who does on the call.]
Bill Walton, who I had a couple of law school classes with, is a bit tougher to take, though he almost always says something I find interesting. In a recent game, for example, he took on the officiating in the Carolina game and pointed out how a certain dribble move exposed the ball to being stolen. I like it when I learn something about the game from an announcer--indeed, that is one reason I am always glad to learn that Casey J is assigned to a Stanford game. I learn something about basketball when Casey J is the color man. If one was able to get smaller doses of Bill and larger doses of what is going on in the game itself, perhaps via moving him to pre- mid-, and post-game work as someone here suggested, I think he would be more fun.
To a great extent, these things are simply a matter of taste, so all who disagree with me about Kevin Danna are certainly entitled to their view. When one takes a position as public as play by play announcer, the deal is that there will be criticism. Thus, I realize that I am only entitled to one vote. My vote is undoubtedly influenced by having become familiar with Kevin Danna's work via Stanford baseball. FWLIW . . . .
If anyone is keeping track, put me down as delighted to have Kevin Danna (and Casey J, of course) assigned to any Cardinal game I am able to catch.