11-04-2021, 03:08 PM
PAC getting very strong. Good to see that at least. Now hopefully Nivar feels there's room for her.
(11-04-2021, 03:06 PM)BosCard Wrote:(11-04-2021, 03:04 PM)Hoops9092 Wrote: Wow. What a snag by Cori Close and UCLA
Well if it wasn't going to be us, then happy it's a PAC-12 school. And happy its not UConn. I don't really understand how Rice, fellow '22 Londynn Jones and '23 Jada Williams can all play point guard and all have the ball in their hands at the same time though.
(11-04-2021, 03:06 PM)BosCard Wrote:(11-04-2021, 03:04 PM)Hoops9092 Wrote: Wow. What a snag by Cori Close and UCLA
Well if it wasn't going to be us, then happy it's a PAC-12 school. And happy its not UConn. I don't really understand how Rice, fellow '22 Londynn Jones and '23 Jada Williams can all play point guard and all have the ball in their hands at the same time though.
(11-04-2021, 02:55 PM)crackpot Wrote: ARRRghahijkj1lk2j3ij4kjl1j'lkja*&^%$#@!!!!!!
Can't believe I've let a 17 year old hold my joy hostage like this.
(11-04-2021, 02:55 PM)crackpot Wrote: ARRRghahijkj1lk2j3ij4kjl1j'lkja*&^%$#@!!!!!!
Can't believe I've let a 17 year old hold my joy hostage like this.
(11-04-2021, 03:28 PM)PVTree Wrote:(11-04-2021, 02:55 PM)crackpot Wrote: ARRRghahijkj1lk2j3ij4kjl1j'lkja*&^%$#@!!!!!!
Can't believe I've let a 17 year old hold my joy hostage like this.
Exactly how I feel. I said never again after KLS chose Yukon. I'm a sore loser also when it comes to recruits that have Stanford ties and choose to go elsewhere when they have the option of attending Stanford.
I got my hopes up for Fudd but not as much as I did for Rice.
(11-04-2021, 03:28 PM)PVTree Wrote:(11-04-2021, 02:55 PM)crackpot Wrote: ARRRghahijkj1lk2j3ij4kjl1j'lkja*&^%$#@!!!!!!
Can't believe I've let a 17 year old hold my joy hostage like this.
Exactly how I feel. I said never again after KLS chose Yukon. I'm a sore loser also when it comes to recruits that have Stanford ties and choose to go elsewhere when they have the option of attending Stanford.
I got my hopes up for Fudd but not as much as I did for Rice.
(11-04-2021, 03:49 PM)chimera Wrote: I wish her well, but I also don't get that choice given their guard situation. They have too many top guards, if that can even be a thing. Is she going to push Osborne out when she comes in with Osborne a junior? What does Londynn Jones, another top guard going to UCLA who is a point, think of this? They all can't play the point, as pointed out above, and playing the point is key to getting a better shot at the WNBA, all that stuff. Close has done better getting her talent to be a cohesive and winning team in the past few years than she used to but still and all, she is what I think of as a prime example of a decent coach but not a great one, whose teams have generally not played up to the talent level. She had the WNBA rookie of the year for this year on her team, plus Canada, who is in the WNBA, etc., and not all that much to show for it. Maybe Rice takes them to the next level? Is she that good?
I hope Nivar sees plenty of playing time and says yes.
(11-04-2021, 03:49 PM)chimera Wrote: I wish her well, but I also don't get that choice given their guard situation. They have too many top guards, if that can even be a thing. Is she going to push Osborne out when she comes in with Osborne a junior? What does Londynn Jones, another top guard going to UCLA who is a point, think of this? They all can't play the point, as pointed out above, and playing the point is key to getting a better shot at the WNBA, all that stuff. Close has done better getting her talent to be a cohesive and winning team in the past few years than she used to but still and all, she is what I think of as a prime example of a decent coach but not a great one, whose teams have generally not played up to the talent level. She had the WNBA rookie of the year for this year on her team, plus Canada, who is in the WNBA, etc., and not all that much to show for it. Maybe Rice takes them to the next level? Is she that good?
I hope Nivar sees plenty of playing time and says yes.
(11-04-2021, 04:23 PM)Card10Fan Wrote: How can UCLA get quality guard after quality guard and we can't recruit guards worth a crap. That's the missing piece for us. I'll feel better if Nivar picks Stanford. If not, just another disappointment. We've had so many misses with guards, it's hard to even remember them all.
(11-04-2021, 03:49 PM)chimera Wrote: I wish her well, but I also don't get that choice given their guard situation. They have too many top guards, if that can even be a thing. Is she going to push Osborne out when she comes in with Osborne a junior? What does Londynn Jones, another top guard going to UCLA who is a point, think of this? They all can't play the point, as pointed out above, and playing the point is key to getting a better shot at the WNBA, all that stuff. Close has done better getting her talent to be a cohesive and winning team in the past few years than she used to but still and all, she is what I think of as a prime example of a decent coach but not a great one, whose teams have generally not played up to the talent level. She had the WNBA rookie of the year for this year on her team, plus Canada, who is in the WNBA, etc., and not all that much to show for it. Maybe Rice takes them to the next level? Is she that good?
I hope Nivar sees plenty of playing time and says yes.
(11-04-2021, 04:23 PM)Card10Fan Wrote: How can UCLA get quality guard after quality guard and we can't recruit guards worth a crap. That's the missing piece for us. I'll feel better if Nivar picks Stanford. If not, just another disappointment. We've had so many misses with guards, it's hard to even remember them all.
(11-04-2021, 03:49 PM)chimera Wrote: I wish her well, but I also don't get that choice given their guard situation. They have too many top guards, if that can even be a thing. Is she going to push Osborne out when she comes in with Osborne a junior? What does Londynn Jones, another top guard going to UCLA who is a point, think of this? They all can't play the point, as pointed out above, and playing the point is key to getting a better shot at the WNBA, all that stuff. Close has done better getting her talent to be a cohesive and winning team in the past few years than she used to but still and all, she is what I think of as a prime example of a decent coach but not a great one, whose teams have generally not played up to the talent level. She had the WNBA rookie of the year for this year on her team, plus Canada, who is in the WNBA, etc., and not all that much to show for it. Maybe Rice takes them to the next level? Is she that good?
I hope Nivar sees plenty of playing time and says yes.
(11-04-2021, 04:41 PM)mbdude Wrote:(11-04-2021, 04:23 PM)Card10Fan Wrote: How can UCLA get quality guard after quality guard and we can't recruit guards worth a crap. That's the missing piece for us. I'll feel better if Nivar picks Stanford. If not, just another disappointment. We've had so many misses with guards, it's hard to even remember them all.
(11-04-2021, 03:49 PM)chimera Wrote: I wish her well, but I also don't get that choice given their guard situation. They have too many top guards, if that can even be a thing. Is she going to push Osborne out when she comes in with Osborne a junior? What does Londynn Jones, another top guard going to UCLA who is a point, think of this? They all can't play the point, as pointed out above, and playing the point is key to getting a better shot at the WNBA, all that stuff. Close has done better getting her talent to be a cohesive and winning team in the past few years than she used to but still and all, she is what I think of as a prime example of a decent coach but not a great one, whose teams have generally not played up to the talent level. She had the WNBA rookie of the year for this year on her team, plus Canada, who is in the WNBA, etc., and not all that much to show for it. Maybe Rice takes them to the next level? Is she that good?
I hope Nivar sees plenty of playing time and says yes.
Yeah, it's too bad we can't recruit quality cards. the second-rate guards we had last year did help us win a natty though
(11-04-2021, 04:41 PM)mbdude Wrote:(11-04-2021, 04:23 PM)Card10Fan Wrote: How can UCLA get quality guard after quality guard and we can't recruit guards worth a crap. That's the missing piece for us. I'll feel better if Nivar picks Stanford. If not, just another disappointment. We've had so many misses with guards, it's hard to even remember them all.
(11-04-2021, 03:49 PM)chimera Wrote: I wish her well, but I also don't get that choice given their guard situation. They have too many top guards, if that can even be a thing. Is she going to push Osborne out when she comes in with Osborne a junior? What does Londynn Jones, another top guard going to UCLA who is a point, think of this? They all can't play the point, as pointed out above, and playing the point is key to getting a better shot at the WNBA, all that stuff. Close has done better getting her talent to be a cohesive and winning team in the past few years than she used to but still and all, she is what I think of as a prime example of a decent coach but not a great one, whose teams have generally not played up to the talent level. She had the WNBA rookie of the year for this year on her team, plus Canada, who is in the WNBA, etc., and not all that much to show for it. Maybe Rice takes them to the next level? Is she that good?
I hope Nivar sees plenty of playing time and says yes.
Yeah, it's too bad we can't recruit quality cards. the second-rate guards we had last year did help us win a natty though
(11-04-2021, 04:41 PM)mbdude Wrote:(11-04-2021, 04:23 PM)Card10Fan Wrote: How can UCLA get quality guard after quality guard and we can't recruit guards worth a crap. That's the missing piece for us. I'll feel better if Nivar picks Stanford. If not, just another disappointment. We've had so many misses with guards, it's hard to even remember them all.
(11-04-2021, 03:49 PM)chimera Wrote: I wish her well, but I also don't get that choice given their guard situation. They have too many top guards, if that can even be a thing. Is she going to push Osborne out when she comes in with Osborne a junior? What does Londynn Jones, another top guard going to UCLA who is a point, think of this? They all can't play the point, as pointed out above, and playing the point is key to getting a better shot at the WNBA, all that stuff. Close has done better getting her talent to be a cohesive and winning team in the past few years than she used to but still and all, she is what I think of as a prime example of a decent coach but not a great one, whose teams have generally not played up to the talent level. She had the WNBA rookie of the year for this year on her team, plus Canada, who is in the WNBA, etc., and not all that much to show for it. Maybe Rice takes them to the next level? Is she that good?
I hope Nivar sees plenty of playing time and says yes.
Yeah, it's too bad we can't recruit quality cards. the second-rate guards we had last year did help us win a natty though
(11-04-2021, 04:41 PM)mbdude Wrote:(11-04-2021, 04:23 PM)Card10Fan Wrote: How can UCLA get quality guard after quality guard and we can't recruit guards worth a crap. That's the missing piece for us. I'll feel better if Nivar picks Stanford. If not, just another disappointment. We've had so many misses with guards, it's hard to even remember them all.
(11-04-2021, 03:49 PM)chimera Wrote: I wish her well, but I also don't get that choice given their guard situation. They have too many top guards, if that can even be a thing. Is she going to push Osborne out when she comes in with Osborne a junior? What does Londynn Jones, another top guard going to UCLA who is a point, think of this? They all can't play the point, as pointed out above, and playing the point is key to getting a better shot at the WNBA, all that stuff. Close has done better getting her talent to be a cohesive and winning team in the past few years than she used to but still and all, she is what I think of as a prime example of a decent coach but not a great one, whose teams have generally not played up to the talent level. She had the WNBA rookie of the year for this year on her team, plus Canada, who is in the WNBA, etc., and not all that much to show for it. Maybe Rice takes them to the next level? Is she that good?
I hope Nivar sees plenty of playing time and says yes.
Yeah, it's too bad we can't recruit quality cards. the second-rate guards we had last year did help us win a natty though
(11-04-2021, 03:14 PM)jonnyss Wrote: i'm disappointed but not shocked. a lot of her photos emphasize her appearance. hollywood is nearby.And, in a way, I admire Kiki RICE for venturing to blaze her own trail, aiming to lead the 2nd most successful athletic program to its first WCBB Final Four. I really like that....
(11-04-2021, 03:14 PM)jonnyss Wrote: i'm disappointed but not shocked. a lot of her photos emphasize her appearance. hollywood is nearby.And, in a way, I admire Kiki RICE for venturing to blaze her own trail, aiming to lead the 2nd most successful athletic program to its first WCBB Final Four. I really like that....