(12-04-2021, 09:42 PM)needle Wrote: (12-04-2021, 09:01 PM)BostonCard Wrote: (12-04-2021, 08:48 PM)Farm93 Wrote: Moving up the LOI window altered a lot of things about recruiting, and this coaching instability even before the season is over seems to be just another item on the list.
I totally agree. Honestly, I don’t see why LOI day isn’t in the spring, close to when regular admissions go out.
BC
The date is in December because of the the growing and growing number of "student-athletes" who enroll in January to uh, get a jump on their studies.
In all seriousness, I am very thankful that Stanford *finally* is allowing that to happen as well.
With the seniors and transfers gone, a lot of schools just need some bodies to help with spring activities. And signing them up before the holidays eliminated the worries that over the school break some coach or extended family member could make a verbal open their recruiting back up.
So the pre-Holiday verbal had some benefits, but now schools want their new coach up and running before that signing period. And that realistically means they need to be on the job before the end of November.
It all makes sense if you accept the inner workings, but I think to a casual fan the whole situation is crazy and seems wrong.
One day a coach might be jumping up and down screaming that the athletes should not transfer just because they are not starting. They might scream to the media that athletes should risk injury to play for their 6-6 team in the run down stadium bowl in front of 12,000 spectators rather than get ready for the NFL combine. The next day that coach might leave his team in the middle of the season so they can fly to another town, recruit high school kids, and collect a slightly bigger paycheck for his "fAAMly".
Though I did enjoy watching ESPN go crazy of Kelly's newly discovered Southern accent.