12-23-2023, 11:03 PM
Man, some of these Holiday Bowls are stinkers. Lots of opt outs to "prepare for the draft" or "enter the portal". Can they be sustained?
(12-24-2023, 08:54 AM)Hurlburt88 Wrote: I don't see this many being sustained. My logic is stinkers >> lower viewership >> advertising rates drop >> not worth it to hold the game
(12-24-2023, 08:54 AM)Hurlburt88 Wrote: I don't see this many being sustained. My logic is stinkers >> lower viewership >> advertising rates drop >> not worth it to hold the game
(12-24-2023, 09:31 AM)gailtate Wrote: Take a closer look. There are more bowl games than ever and big-time college football is flourishing as never, ever, before. And it's also become a bettor's bonanza. Except, of course, for those unfortunates who succumb to gambling addiction. Ain't nuthin' like sports!
(12-24-2023, 09:31 AM)gailtate Wrote: Take a closer look. There are more bowl games than ever and big-time college football is flourishing as never, ever, before. And it's also become a bettor's bonanza. Except, of course, for those unfortunates who succumb to gambling addiction. Ain't nuthin' like sports!
chrisk dateline='[url=tel:1703461969' Wrote: 1703461969[/url]']
Half of the bowls are for Group of 5 teams. ESPN uses less expensive talent and probably gets a sweetheart deal from the hosts of those games. Most of those teams don’t get that much visibility during the regular season and don’t require much of a payout.
chrisk dateline='[url=tel:1703461969' Wrote: 1703461969[/url]']
Half of the bowls are for Group of 5 teams. ESPN uses less expensive talent and probably gets a sweetheart deal from the hosts of those games. Most of those teams don’t get that much visibility during the regular season and don’t require much of a payout.
(12-24-2023, 06:53 PM)Giants Wrote:I wouldn't be so sure of that. They own these games. If they aren't played, they become worthless and their value must be written off. That write off may be too much to bear. Disney wouldn't like that at all. If these games break even, or almost so, they can justify keeping them to protect the asset. There are also undoubtedly contractual obligations involved with these games that make abandonment very expensive. Lots of reasons to continue until the real costs clearly exceed the cost of abandonment.chrisk dateline='[url=tel:1703461969' Wrote: 1703461969[/url]']
Half of the bowls are for Group of 5 teams. ESPN uses less expensive talent and probably gets a sweetheart deal from the hosts of those games. Most of those teams don’t get that much visibility during the regular season and don’t require much of a payout.
ESPN owns 17 of the 41 bowl games, mostly games scheduled prior to Christmas between Group of 5 teams. I’m sure they make a nice profit. Otherwise, they would eliminate the expense by wiping the game off the schedule.
(12-24-2023, 06:53 PM)Giants Wrote:I wouldn't be so sure of that. They own these games. If they aren't played, they become worthless and their value must be written off. That write off may be too much to bear. Disney wouldn't like that at all. If these games break even, or almost so, they can justify keeping them to protect the asset. There are also undoubtedly contractual obligations involved with these games that make abandonment very expensive. Lots of reasons to continue until the real costs clearly exceed the cost of abandonment.chrisk dateline='[url=tel:1703461969' Wrote: 1703461969[/url]']
Half of the bowls are for Group of 5 teams. ESPN uses less expensive talent and probably gets a sweetheart deal from the hosts of those games. Most of those teams don’t get that much visibility during the regular season and don’t require much of a payout.
ESPN owns 17 of the 41 bowl games, mostly games scheduled prior to Christmas between Group of 5 teams. I’m sure they make a nice profit. Otherwise, they would eliminate the expense by wiping the game off the schedule.
(12-30-2023, 02:03 PM)terry Wrote: I heard that more than 20 FSU players have opted out of the Orange Bowl. Can that possibly be right? Does Georgia also have players who are opting out?
(12-30-2023, 02:03 PM)terry Wrote: I heard that more than 20 FSU players have opted out of the Orange Bowl. Can that possibly be right? Does Georgia also have players who are opting out?
(12-30-2023, 02:03 PM)terry Wrote: I heard that more than 20 FSU players have opted out of the Orange Bowl. Can that possibly be right? Does Georgia also have players who are opting out?
(12-30-2023, 02:03 PM)terry Wrote: I heard that more than 20 FSU players have opted out of the Orange Bowl. Can that possibly be right? Does Georgia also have players who are opting out?
(12-30-2023, 01:30 PM)CardinalSagehen Wrote: I'm excited to watch Georgia annihilate the whiny babies at FSU today.
They were sympathetic characters until they filed a frivolous lawsuit to leave the conference just because they didn't like how the media contract (that they signed) turned out for them.
(12-30-2023, 01:30 PM)CardinalSagehen Wrote: I'm excited to watch Georgia annihilate the whiny babies at FSU today.
They were sympathetic characters until they filed a frivolous lawsuit to leave the conference just because they didn't like how the media contract (that they signed) turned out for them.
(12-30-2023, 05:31 PM)Goose Wrote: Games like the Orange Bowl today will sooner (not later) kill the bowl games. FSU just didn't show up, both literally (the opt-outs) and figuratively. The Ohio St. team that played Missouri also wasn't the team that won all those games in the B1G, but then again, the Notre Dame that played Oregon State was missing some "important" players too. OTOH, Oregon State was missing both players and their coach. The attraction of these games is to see the "best", and when all those players opt-out the audience isn't getting anywhere near the "best" and will opt out too. In no world that I live in will people pay top dollar for these hot messes. It may take a couple of years, but after repeated examples of incompetence due to missing personnel, nobody will watch.
(12-30-2023, 05:31 PM)Goose Wrote: Games like the Orange Bowl today will sooner (not later) kill the bowl games. FSU just didn't show up, both literally (the opt-outs) and figuratively. The Ohio St. team that played Missouri also wasn't the team that won all those games in the B1G, but then again, the Notre Dame that played Oregon State was missing some "important" players too. OTOH, Oregon State was missing both players and their coach. The attraction of these games is to see the "best", and when all those players opt-out the audience isn't getting anywhere near the "best" and will opt out too. In no world that I live in will people pay top dollar for these hot messes. It may take a couple of years, but after repeated examples of incompetence due to missing personnel, nobody will watch.