[ADPinWDC]

Who has the fewest points scored in the ACC this season (109 across six games at 1-5)?  
... only 3 games in Conf with more than 20 points.  
https://www.espn.com/college-football/st.../_/group/1

Last 3:   LOUV, @CAL, then @SJST.  

Cal at 5-4 needs to beat us for a bowl invite at 6-6, with other games remaining vs SYRC, and SMU.

[ADPinWDC]

Who has the fewest points scored in the ACC this season (109 across six games at 1-5)?  
... only 3 games in Conf with more than 20 points.  
https://www.espn.com/college-football/st.../_/group/1

Last 3:   LOUV, @CAL, then @SJST.  

Cal at 5-4 needs to beat us for a bowl invite at 6-6, with other games remaining vs SYRC, and SMU.

[Goose]

Who has the fewest points scored in the ACC this season (109 across six games at 1-5)?  
... only 3 games in Conf with more than 20 points.  
https://www.espn.com/college-football/st.../_/group/1

Last 3:   LOUV, @CAL, then @SJST.  

Cal at 5-4 needs to beat us for a bowl invite at 6-6, with other games remaining vs SYRC, and SMU.

Kal plays Syracuse tomorrow. If they beat them, they will already be bowl eligible. IMO that would be the preferred outcome. Kal has a reasonable chance to win that game. After all, even Stanford beat Syracuse :-). It will also be a home game for Kal, which should help. Kal is favored by 8.5 pts.

[Goose]

Who has the fewest points scored in the ACC this season (109 across six games at 1-5)?  
... only 3 games in Conf with more than 20 points.  
https://www.espn.com/college-football/st.../_/group/1

Last 3:   LOUV, @CAL, then @SJST.  

Cal at 5-4 needs to beat us for a bowl invite at 6-6, with other games remaining vs SYRC, and SMU.

Kal plays Syracuse tomorrow. If they beat them, they will already be bowl eligible. IMO that would be the preferred outcome. Kal has a reasonable chance to win that game. After all, even Stanford beat Syracuse :-). It will also be a home game for Kal, which should help. Kal is favored by 8.5 pts.

[Snorlax94]

In the Battle of the Cards , the Cardinal finally gets its passing game going, its defense steps up just enough, the Cardinal birds make just enough mistakes, and Stanford gets the surprising upset win 28-27.

[Snorlax94]

In the Battle of the Cards , the Cardinal finally gets its passing game going, its defense steps up just enough, the Cardinal birds make just enough mistakes, and Stanford gets the surprising upset win 28-27.

[JohnR34231]

In the Battle of the Cards , the Cardinal finally gets its passing game going, its defense steps up just enough, the Cardinal birds make just enough mistakes, and Stanford gets the surprising upset win 28-27.

Nice to be optimistic.
Doesn't cost anything (at least with a Cardboard post) to be wrong.

[JohnR34231]

In the Battle of the Cards , the Cardinal finally gets its passing game going, its defense steps up just enough, the Cardinal birds make just enough mistakes, and Stanford gets the surprising upset win 28-27.

Nice to be optimistic.
Doesn't cost anything (at least with a Cardboard post) to be wrong.

[martyup]

In the Battle of the Cards , the Cardinal finally gets its passing game going, its defense steps up just enough, the Cardinal birds make just enough mistakes, and Stanford gets the surprising upset win 28-27.

Nice to be optimistic.
Doesn't cost anything (at least with a Cardboard post) to be wrong.

[martyup]

In the Battle of the Cards , the Cardinal finally gets its passing game going, its defense steps up just enough, the Cardinal birds make just enough mistakes, and Stanford gets the surprising upset win 28-27.

Nice to be optimistic.
Doesn't cost anything (at least with a Cardboard post) to be wrong.

[lex24]

Louisville 45-17

[lex24]

Louisville 45-17

[MV72018]

In the Battle of the Cards , the Cardinal finally gets its passing game going, its defense steps up just enough, the Cardinal birds make just enough mistakes, and Stanford gets the surprising upset win 28-27.

Yes, it's nice to be "optimistic" -- if you don't mind eroding your credibility! Your "finally get[ting] its passing game going" would require either a miraculous transformation of our O line or the furtive transfer of new starting linemen from Oregon or Ohio State during the bye week. Our passing game will remain anemic until whichever QB is in there gets decent pass protection, permitting separation and some long routes rather than alternating between five-yard routes, running for his life, and taking a survival sack.

[MV72018]

In the Battle of the Cards , the Cardinal finally gets its passing game going, its defense steps up just enough, the Cardinal birds make just enough mistakes, and Stanford gets the surprising upset win 28-27.

Yes, it's nice to be "optimistic" -- if you don't mind eroding your credibility! Your "finally get[ting] its passing game going" would require either a miraculous transformation of our O line or the furtive transfer of new starting linemen from Oregon or Ohio State during the bye week. Our passing game will remain anemic until whichever QB is in there gets decent pass protection, permitting separation and some long routes rather than alternating between five-yard routes, running for his life, and taking a survival sack.

[cardcrimson]

In the Battle of the Cards , the Cardinal finally gets its passing game going, its defense steps up just enough, the Cardinal birds make just enough mistakes, and Stanford gets the surprising upset win 28-27.

Nice to be optimistic.
Doesn't cost anything (at least with a Cardboard post) to be wrong.

You missed the rest of the video. . . .

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DolhjpUPga4&t=7s

Is there a trick to imbedding a video? The imbed a video link just leaves a big, blank space. . . .TIA

[cardcrimson]

In the Battle of the Cards , the Cardinal finally gets its passing game going, its defense steps up just enough, the Cardinal birds make just enough mistakes, and Stanford gets the surprising upset win 28-27.

Nice to be optimistic.
Doesn't cost anything (at least with a Cardboard post) to be wrong.

You missed the rest of the video. . . .

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DolhjpUPga4&t=7s

Is there a trick to imbedding a video? The imbed a video link just leaves a big, blank space. . . .TIA

[qwerty49]

In the Battle of the Cards , the Cardinal finally gets its passing game going, its defense steps up just enough, the Cardinal birds make just enough mistakes, and Stanford gets the surprising upset win 28-27.

Yes, it's nice to be "optimistic" -- if you don't mind eroding your credibility! Your "finally get[ting] its passing game going" would require either a miraculous transformation of our O line or the furtive transfer of new starting linemen from Oregon or Ohio State during the bye week. Our passing game will remain anemic until whichever QB is in there gets decent pass protection, permitting separation and some long routes rather than alternating between five-yard routes, running for his life, and taking a survival sack.

I just want to see a few quick release passes over the middle, most likely to Roush.  But that would require 1) putting pass pro entirely on the 5 OL, and 2) a quick release by the QB.  It's also pretty sad that we rarely have enough time to get a back into a pass pattern that isn't a screen or a safety valve flare. (CMC vs Iowa spoiled me, LOL.)

I kind of wonder if TT really expects our O to score more than twice a game.  What makes the situation even worse is that when we get a few scores down, we'll never try kicking a FG.  

Question for the stat guys -- what's our record against the O/U this year?

[qwerty49]

In the Battle of the Cards , the Cardinal finally gets its passing game going, its defense steps up just enough, the Cardinal birds make just enough mistakes, and Stanford gets the surprising upset win 28-27.

Yes, it's nice to be "optimistic" -- if you don't mind eroding your credibility! Your "finally get[ting] its passing game going" would require either a miraculous transformation of our O line or the furtive transfer of new starting linemen from Oregon or Ohio State during the bye week. Our passing game will remain anemic until whichever QB is in there gets decent pass protection, permitting separation and some long routes rather than alternating between five-yard routes, running for his life, and taking a survival sack.

I just want to see a few quick release passes over the middle, most likely to Roush.  But that would require 1) putting pass pro entirely on the 5 OL, and 2) a quick release by the QB.  It's also pretty sad that we rarely have enough time to get a back into a pass pattern that isn't a screen or a safety valve flare. (CMC vs Iowa spoiled me, LOL.)

I kind of wonder if TT really expects our O to score more than twice a game.  What makes the situation even worse is that when we get a few scores down, we'll never try kicking a FG.  

Question for the stat guys -- what's our record against the O/U this year?

[martyup]

You missed the rest of the video. . . .

Is there a trick to imbedding a video? The imbed a video link just leaves a big, blank space. . . .TIA

[martyup]

You missed the rest of the video. . . .

Is there a trick to imbedding a video? The imbed a video link just leaves a big, blank space. . . .TIA

[needle]

In the Battle of the Cards , the Cardinal finally gets its passing game going, its defense steps up just enough, the Cardinal birds make just enough mistakes, and Stanford gets the surprising upset win 28-27.

Yes, it's nice to be "optimistic" -- if you don't mind eroding your credibility! Your "finally get[ting] its passing game going" would require either a miraculous transformation of our O line or the furtive transfer of new starting linemen from Oregon or Ohio State during the bye week. Our passing game will remain anemic until whichever QB is in there gets decent pass protection, permitting separation and some long routes rather than alternating between five-yard routes, running for his life, and taking a survival sack.

Louisville ranks 73rd in passing yards allowed, and its rushing defense ranks 66th nationally. Not terrible, but not very good either. The conditions are ripe for a very interesting game. I definitely expect Stanford to cover the spread. We'll see...

[needle]

In the Battle of the Cards , the Cardinal finally gets its passing game going, its defense steps up just enough, the Cardinal birds make just enough mistakes, and Stanford gets the surprising upset win 28-27.

Yes, it's nice to be "optimistic" -- if you don't mind eroding your credibility! Your "finally get[ting] its passing game going" would require either a miraculous transformation of our O line or the furtive transfer of new starting linemen from Oregon or Ohio State during the bye week. Our passing game will remain anemic until whichever QB is in there gets decent pass protection, permitting separation and some long routes rather than alternating between five-yard routes, running for his life, and taking a survival sack.

Louisville ranks 73rd in passing yards allowed, and its rushing defense ranks 66th nationally. Not terrible, but not very good either. The conditions are ripe for a very interesting game. I definitely expect Stanford to cover the spread. We'll see...

[martyup]

Stanford Steve does not predict that we cover the spread.

[martyup]

Stanford Steve does not predict that we cover the spread.

[BostonCard]

In the Battle of the Cards , the Cardinal finally gets its passing game going, its defense steps up just enough, the Cardinal birds make just enough mistakes, and Stanford gets the surprising upset win 28-27.

BC

[BostonCard]

In the Battle of the Cards , the Cardinal finally gets its passing game going, its defense steps up just enough, the Cardinal birds make just enough mistakes, and Stanford gets the surprising upset win 28-27.

BC

[martyup]

JJJ predicted 35-38 in favor of Stanford.  

[martyup]

JJJ predicted 35-38 in favor of Stanford.  

[BostonCard]

JJJ predicted 35-38 in favor of Stanford.  

Any stock tips?

BC

[BostonCard]

JJJ predicted 35-38 in favor of Stanford.  

Any stock tips?

BC

[Snorlax94]

In the Battle of the Cards , the Cardinal finally gets its passing game going, its defense steps up just enough, the Cardinal birds make just enough mistakes, and Stanford gets the surprising upset win 28-27.

Yes, it's nice to be "optimistic" -- if you don't mind eroding your credibility! Your "finally get[ting] its passing game going" would require either a miraculous transformation of our O line or the furtive transfer of new starting linemen from Oregon or Ohio State during the bye week. Our passing game will remain anemic until whichever QB is in there gets decent pass protection, permitting separation and some long routes rather than alternating between five-yard routes, running for his life, and taking a survival sack.

Woohoo!! I wasn’t as accurate as JJJ but now I have successfully predicted 40 of the last 1 upset victories!!!

[Snorlax94]

In the Battle of the Cards , the Cardinal finally gets its passing game going, its defense steps up just enough, the Cardinal birds make just enough mistakes, and Stanford gets the surprising upset win 28-27.

Yes, it's nice to be "optimistic" -- if you don't mind eroding your credibility! Your "finally get[ting] its passing game going" would require either a miraculous transformation of our O line or the furtive transfer of new starting linemen from Oregon or Ohio State during the bye week. Our passing game will remain anemic until whichever QB is in there gets decent pass protection, permitting separation and some long routes rather than alternating between five-yard routes, running for his life, and taking a survival sack.

Woohoo!! I wasn’t as accurate as JJJ but now I have successfully predicted 40 of the last 1 upset victories!!!

[JJJ]

JJJ predicted 35-38 in favor of Stanford.  

Any stock tips?

BC

Buy low, sell high? 
Or was it buy high, sell higher? :)

[JJJ]

JJJ predicted 35-38 in favor of Stanford.  

Any stock tips?

BC

Buy low, sell high? 
Or was it buy high, sell higher? :)

[cardcrimson]

You missed the rest of the video. . . .

Is there a trick to imbedding a video? The imbed a video link just leaves a big, blank space. . . .TIA

For gifs, do you just put it in as an image? How about video links?

[cardcrimson]

You missed the rest of the video. . . .

Is there a trick to imbedding a video? The imbed a video link just leaves a big, blank space. . . .TIA

For gifs, do you just put it in as an image? How about video links?

[martyup]

You missed the rest of the video. . . .

Is there a trick to imbedding a video? The imbed a video link just leaves a big, blank space. . . .TIA

For gifs, do you just put it in as an image? How about video links?

That feature does not work on this platform.  You just post the link and people have to click it to see the video.

[martyup]

You missed the rest of the video. . . .

Is there a trick to imbedding a video? The imbed a video link just leaves a big, blank space. . . .TIA

For gifs, do you just put it in as an image? How about video links?

That feature does not work on this platform.  You just post the link and people have to click it to see the video.

[qwerty49]

Stanford Steve does not predict that we cover the spread.

Honestly, I don't even remember him being in our 2-deep.  Rated 5-stars out of HS and never really played much for us.

[qwerty49]

Stanford Steve does not predict that we cover the spread.

Honestly, I don't even remember him being in our 2-deep.  Rated 5-stars out of HS and never really played much for us.