03-19-2025, 05:23 PM
Slightly OT. When was the last time the men's basketball team played in the post-season and the women's team didn't? I figure you gotta go back at least 32 years.
(03-19-2025, 05:23 PM)TonyLima Wrote: Slightly OT. When was the last time the men's basketball team played in the post-season and the women's team didn't? I figure you gotta go back at least 32 years.
(03-19-2025, 05:23 PM)TonyLima Wrote: Slightly OT. When was the last time the men's basketball team played in the post-season and the women's team didn't? I figure you gotta go back at least 32 years.
(03-19-2025, 10:13 PM)81alum Wrote:(03-19-2025, 08:06 PM)BobK Wrote: Oh ?? Stanford won their only ncaa title in 1942.Led by Howie Dallmar, who later became head coach for 21 seasons. He could never do as a coach what he accomplished as a player.
(03-19-2025, 10:13 PM)81alum Wrote:(03-19-2025, 08:06 PM)BobK Wrote: Oh ?? Stanford won their only ncaa title in 1942.Led by Howie Dallmar, who later became head coach for 21 seasons. He could never do as a coach what he accomplished as a player.
(03-19-2025, 10:19 PM)StanUSwagU Wrote:(03-19-2025, 10:13 PM)81alum Wrote:(03-19-2025, 08:06 PM)BobK Wrote: Oh ?? Stanford won their only ncaa title in 1942.Led by Howie Dallmar, who later became head coach for 21 seasons. He could never do as a coach what he accomplished as a player.
I wonder if in 1942,
• If Stanford clutched its pearls as rigidly as it does today in 2025, about thinking their 'academic standards' were better than Notre Dame or Duke, or unchangeable edicts/standards from God ?
• If the Stanford Band ran around the football field, like chickens with their heads cut off, or mice scurrying around after the kitchen lights were turned on at night, or if they played & marched like a traditional sane college-band (Dont mean to offend any LSJUMB members, but I just wonder if maybe our current band could do 1/2 the games as a traditional marching band, & the other half as the irreverent band, just to make sure some Athletes and students who like great marching bands that march in unison aren't turned off from coming to Stanford)
• If the student body took pride in calling themselves 'Nerds' ?
Just wondering ....
(03-19-2025, 10:19 PM)StanUSwagU Wrote:(03-19-2025, 10:13 PM)81alum Wrote:(03-19-2025, 08:06 PM)BobK Wrote: Oh ?? Stanford won their only ncaa title in 1942.Led by Howie Dallmar, who later became head coach for 21 seasons. He could never do as a coach what he accomplished as a player.
I wonder if in 1942,
• If Stanford clutched its pearls as rigidly as it does today in 2025, about thinking their 'academic standards' were better than Notre Dame or Duke, or unchangeable edicts/standards from God ?
• If the Stanford Band ran around the football field, like chickens with their heads cut off, or mice scurrying around after the kitchen lights were turned on at night, or if they played & marched like a traditional sane college-band (Dont mean to offend any LSJUMB members, but I just wonder if maybe our current band could do 1/2 the games as a traditional marching band, & the other half as the irreverent band, just to make sure some Athletes and students who like great marching bands that march in unison aren't turned off from coming to Stanford)
• If the student body took pride in calling themselves 'Nerds' ?
Just wondering ....
(03-19-2025, 10:19 PM)StanUSwagU Wrote: I wonder if in 1942,
• If Stanford clutched its pearls as rigidly as it does today in 2025, about thinking their 'academic standards' were better than Notre Dame or Duke, or unchangeable edicts/standards from God ?
• If the Stanford Band ran around the football field, like chickens with their heads cut off, or mice scurrying around after the kitchen lights were turned on at night, or if they played & marched like a traditional sane college-band (Dont mean to offend any LSJUMB members, but I just wonder if maybe our current band could do 1/2 the games as a traditional marching band, & the other half as the irreverent band, just to make sure some Athletes and students who like great marching bands that march in unison aren't turned off from coming to Stanford)
• If the student body took pride in calling themselves 'Nerds' ?
Just wondering ....
Quote:In 1949 Wallace Sterling became president (1949–1968) and he oversaw the rise of Stanford from a regional university to one of the most prestigious universities in the United States. Before the 1950s many regarded Stanford as being "a college for the children of wealthy parents".https://www.proquest.com/docview/1435607944
(03-19-2025, 10:19 PM)StanUSwagU Wrote: I wonder if in 1942,
• If Stanford clutched its pearls as rigidly as it does today in 2025, about thinking their 'academic standards' were better than Notre Dame or Duke, or unchangeable edicts/standards from God ?
• If the Stanford Band ran around the football field, like chickens with their heads cut off, or mice scurrying around after the kitchen lights were turned on at night, or if they played & marched like a traditional sane college-band (Dont mean to offend any LSJUMB members, but I just wonder if maybe our current band could do 1/2 the games as a traditional marching band, & the other half as the irreverent band, just to make sure some Athletes and students who like great marching bands that march in unison aren't turned off from coming to Stanford)
• If the student body took pride in calling themselves 'Nerds' ?
Just wondering ....
Quote:In 1949 Wallace Sterling became president (1949–1968) and he oversaw the rise of Stanford from a regional university to one of the most prestigious universities in the United States. Before the 1950s many regarded Stanford as being "a college for the children of wealthy parents".https://www.proquest.com/docview/1435607944
(03-20-2025, 04:01 PM)fullmetal Wrote: In 1942, there would have been no Japanese students allowed. Minority students (black, Jewish, Latino, etc.) were few and far between. People were still dying of polio, influenza, diptheria, etc. I'm guessing university enrollment everywhere was lower due to wartime enlistment, and that affected the competitive landscape.Actually the University was beyond full. https://exhibits.stanford.edu/stanford-s...ture/1940s Stanford was full of students that were not "admitted" by normal channels. As the article states the military took over the University. The fate of Stanford's (few) Japanese students is also covered. During the war years I seriously doubt admission standards were "normal", as the number of places available to non-military students was not under Stanford's control.
(03-20-2025, 04:01 PM)fullmetal Wrote: In 1942, there would have been no Japanese students allowed. Minority students (black, Jewish, Latino, etc.) were few and far between. People were still dying of polio, influenza, diptheria, etc. I'm guessing university enrollment everywhere was lower due to wartime enlistment, and that affected the competitive landscape.Actually the University was beyond full. https://exhibits.stanford.edu/stanford-s...ture/1940s Stanford was full of students that were not "admitted" by normal channels. As the article states the military took over the University. The fate of Stanford's (few) Japanese students is also covered. During the war years I seriously doubt admission standards were "normal", as the number of places available to non-military students was not under Stanford's control.
(03-20-2025, 04:23 PM)Goose Wrote: Actually the University was beyond full. https://exhibits.stanford.edu/stanford-s...ture/1940s Stanford was full of students that were not "admitted" by normal channels. As the article states the military took over the University. The fate of Stanford's (few) Japanese students is also covered. During the war years I seriously doubt admission standards were "normal", as the number of places available to non-military students was not under Stanford's control.
(03-20-2025, 04:23 PM)Goose Wrote: Actually the University was beyond full. https://exhibits.stanford.edu/stanford-s...ture/1940s Stanford was full of students that were not "admitted" by normal channels. As the article states the military took over the University. The fate of Stanford's (few) Japanese students is also covered. During the war years I seriously doubt admission standards were "normal", as the number of places available to non-military students was not under Stanford's control.
(03-20-2025, 04:01 PM)fullmetal Wrote:(03-19-2025, 10:19 PM)StanUSwagU Wrote: I wonder if in 1942,
• If Stanford clutched its pearls as rigidly as it does today in 2025, about thinking their 'academic standards' were better than Notre Dame or Duke, or unchangeable edicts/standards from God ?
• If the Stanford Band ran around the football field, like chickens with their heads cut off, or mice scurrying around after the kitchen lights were turned on at night, or if they played & marched like a traditional sane college-band (Dont mean to offend any LSJUMB members, but I just wonder if maybe our current band could do 1/2 the games as a traditional marching band, & the other half as the irreverent band, just to make sure some Athletes and students who like great marching bands that march in unison aren't turned off from coming to Stanford)
• If the student body took pride in calling themselves 'Nerds' ?
Just wondering ....
In 1942, there would have been no Japanese students allowed. Minority students (black, Jewish, Latino, etc.) were few and far between. People were still dying of polio, influenza, diptheria, etc. I'm guessing university enrollment everywhere was lower due to wartime enlistment, and that affected the competitive landscape. Hank Luisetti, of Stanford basketball fame, suffered a bout of near-fatal spinal meningitis that prevented him from playing professionally for the Knicks (or any team ever again) in 1946.
Quote:In 1949 Wallace Sterling became president (1949–1968) and he oversaw the rise of Stanford from a regional university to one of the most prestigious universities in the United States. Before the 1950s many regarded Stanford as being "a college for the children of wealthy parents".https://www.proquest.com/docview/1435607944
Basically, Stanford in 1942 was SMU right about now (or some years prior to their ACC membership).
There should be no wistful longing to return to Stanford of 1942, nor should that time be held as a standard for Stanford of today.
(03-20-2025, 04:01 PM)fullmetal Wrote:(03-19-2025, 10:19 PM)StanUSwagU Wrote: I wonder if in 1942,
• If Stanford clutched its pearls as rigidly as it does today in 2025, about thinking their 'academic standards' were better than Notre Dame or Duke, or unchangeable edicts/standards from God ?
• If the Stanford Band ran around the football field, like chickens with their heads cut off, or mice scurrying around after the kitchen lights were turned on at night, or if they played & marched like a traditional sane college-band (Dont mean to offend any LSJUMB members, but I just wonder if maybe our current band could do 1/2 the games as a traditional marching band, & the other half as the irreverent band, just to make sure some Athletes and students who like great marching bands that march in unison aren't turned off from coming to Stanford)
• If the student body took pride in calling themselves 'Nerds' ?
Just wondering ....
In 1942, there would have been no Japanese students allowed. Minority students (black, Jewish, Latino, etc.) were few and far between. People were still dying of polio, influenza, diptheria, etc. I'm guessing university enrollment everywhere was lower due to wartime enlistment, and that affected the competitive landscape. Hank Luisetti, of Stanford basketball fame, suffered a bout of near-fatal spinal meningitis that prevented him from playing professionally for the Knicks (or any team ever again) in 1946.
Quote:In 1949 Wallace Sterling became president (1949–1968) and he oversaw the rise of Stanford from a regional university to one of the most prestigious universities in the United States. Before the 1950s many regarded Stanford as being "a college for the children of wealthy parents".https://www.proquest.com/docview/1435607944
Basically, Stanford in 1942 was SMU right about now (or some years prior to their ACC membership).
There should be no wistful longing to return to Stanford of 1942, nor should that time be held as a standard for Stanford of today.
(03-21-2025, 06:30 AM)Mick Wrote: Granddad was taking a Japanese Economic History class that met at 8 a.m. on Mondays, and that's how he found out about Pearl Harbor.
(03-21-2025, 06:30 AM)Mick Wrote: Granddad was taking a Japanese Economic History class that met at 8 a.m. on Mondays, and that's how he found out about Pearl Harbor.
(03-21-2025, 11:49 AM)M T Wrote:(03-21-2025, 06:30 AM)Mick Wrote: Granddad was taking a Japanese Economic History class that met at 8 a.m. on Mondays, and that's how he found out about Pearl Harbor.
That would be like not knowing about 9/11 until 9/12 ! Obviously no TV and probably no car (with radio). I can imagine he got no newspaper on Sunday night or Monday morning. I can imagine not listening to the radio at all on Sunday. But someone around where he lived or shopped (most stores would be closed) or studied or worshipped would be talking about it on Sunday. Did he say why he was so insulated that day?
I have never attended a reunion of my college but did attend a couple of my high school. That doesn’t mean for me that there was anything wrong with the school or the time.
(03-21-2025, 11:49 AM)M T Wrote:(03-21-2025, 06:30 AM)Mick Wrote: Granddad was taking a Japanese Economic History class that met at 8 a.m. on Mondays, and that's how he found out about Pearl Harbor.
That would be like not knowing about 9/11 until 9/12 ! Obviously no TV and probably no car (with radio). I can imagine he got no newspaper on Sunday night or Monday morning. I can imagine not listening to the radio at all on Sunday. But someone around where he lived or shopped (most stores would be closed) or studied or worshipped would be talking about it on Sunday. Did he say why he was so insulated that day?
I have never attended a reunion of my college but did attend a couple of my high school. That doesn’t mean for me that there was anything wrong with the school or the time.
(03-21-2025, 12:25 PM)Mick Wrote: With respect to the reunions, I do think it says something if you attend literally every single high school reunion for 60 years in which the high school is three states and nearly 1,000 miles away but you don't attend any college reunions during that time when the college is 25 miles away.
(03-21-2025, 12:25 PM)Mick Wrote: With respect to the reunions, I do think it says something if you attend literally every single high school reunion for 60 years in which the high school is three states and nearly 1,000 miles away but you don't attend any college reunions during that time when the college is 25 miles away.