03-20-2012, 09:18 AM
MT, nice explanation. I happened to rewatch the first half last night, and I think you're right.
What Mary said was a bit ambiguous/confusing because she didn't say which foul we should have shot FTs on. Moments ago, viewers had seen a takedown of Tinkle during the 3-pointer which we were expecting to have been called a foul -- but that was actually a no-call. So some of us were erroneously thinking that was the foul we should have shot FTs on.
What Mary said was a bit ambiguous/confusing because she didn't say which foul we should have shot FTs on. Moments ago, viewers had seen a takedown of Tinkle during the 3-pointer which we were expecting to have been called a foul -- but that was actually a no-call. So some of us were erroneously thinking that was the foul we should have shot FTs on.